Bitrot

joined 1 year ago
[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 week ago

It only blocks communities from that instance.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago

The bot demonstrated very well what this article is about. I don’t know the internals, but I also can’t image the bot was using the best and most expensive ways of doing analysis.

It was pretty bad at “getting the point” even when it was obvious, a better system should be able to do so. Sometimes the point is more difficult to discern and there has to be some judgement, you can see this in comments sometimes where people discuss what “the point” was and not just the data. I imagine an AI would have some difficulty determining what is worth summarizing in these situations especially.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 week ago

Different applications have better performance on one vs other. Google Cloud still offers a lot of Nvidia options.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 2 weeks ago

I was confused how a resume or application would be largely affected, but the article points out that software is often used to look over social media now as part of hiring (which is awful).

The bias when it determined guilt or considered consequences for a crime is concerning as more law enforcement agencies integrate black box algorithms into investigative work.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Do you sideload extensions in Chromium browsers often? No browser makes it especially easy, auto-updates are hit and miss (uBo has a zip from GitHub, does that auto update?), and it’s extremely likely that many authors don’t bother with special niche development when the vast majority of their user-base is gone (he doesn’t build an XUL version anymore either).

It’s, in fact, some kind of problem even if it isn’t for you.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

And AOL. I’d say it sounds more AOL before they allowed access to the open internet, even.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 weeks ago

It’s effective for probably most typical users (set it and forget it), especially if you “up” the permissions. Downside is the filter rules have to be bundled in the extension, so it doesn’t update dynamically.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The problem with most of them, is they don’t host their own extension repositories, so their support doesn’t really matter unless you side load all the time.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Somewhat. One, a system can be bootable without the entries because they are just pointers to the actual bootloader, so even if windows does the stupid and deletes them it isn’t the end of the world. It does depend on your specific firmware though.

Also two, you can write them again with a single line in efibootmgr, they’re just saying “if I click Fedora load the shim from the EFI system partition on disk 1”.

This is very different than the old world where windows would delete your bootloader entirely and the MBR couldn’t be easily explored. They live in the efi system partition instead - or at least the shim does- and typically every OS leaves the other ones alone (even Windows, except in this case, although it didn’t touch the shim itself).

The initial comment was about the bootloader and really only applies to MBR partitions.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

Bash is still in MacOS.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

XNU is the kernel in Darwin, XNU is an Apple product derived from BSD and Mach. Darwin has a lot of FreeBSD in it.

Apple shares that code though. It’s on GitHub. There used to be Darwin distributions.

Your Android example doesn’t make very much sense either. The largest Android issues are typically hardware lockdown. Nothing about the GPL prevents someone building an ad platform that spies on you, it just makes them share the source code for it. Google’s licensing choices means they don’t share the source code for the Google pieces they put on top of AOSP, the entire project means people can build the alternatives though.

The lawsuits were about AT&Ts proprietary license. BSD and similar licenses are not that.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

386BSD was not available until some months after Linux was released, so you had GNU with no working kernel and BSD not yet available on the hardware he had, hardware a lot of normal people had. I think the GPL also felt more philosophically right to many of them, and it limited how much they needed to re-do work that someone else had already done but kept secret.

The AT&T lawsuit definitely hampered BSD growth just as it was ported to the 386, but it was filed after Linux was already a thing.

view more: ‹ prev next ›