God, I hated this book when I read it in high school. I avoided Victorian-era literature for so long because of it.
I doubt I had the emotional maturity to get much out of it back then. I'd probably have a better time now, but I have a grudge at this point and I'm gonna stick with it, dammit.
Man, that's cool! Concrete is a heck of a lot cheaper than epoxy granite resin and is perfectly suitable for a low-precision tool like this lathe.
I do hope that he finds a way to shield those bearings. You really don't want metal chips or sawdust making its way in there. Any damage they sustain will cause runout, which will lead to increased chatter and parts that are out of spec. Plus, a matching pair of tapered roller bearings can be quite expensive!
EDIT: to be clear, I mean no disrespect when I say low-precision. Not every lathe needs to have slides and handwheels. I have a little Sherline lathe that I've used like this in the past (using gravers, not tools in a tool holder). It's great to quickly turn something or to put nice decorative details on a part. Precision is possible with a lathe like this, but it requires fairly strenuous effort.
Based off of your comment history, it seeeeems like you live in the US, although I could deffo be wrong. That's where I live, so I may have good news. It's illegal to sell tritium products in the US, but it's not illegal to buy it as an individual. There's a Taiwanese company that sells all kinds of cool little tritium widgets: https://www.mixglo.com/
that's where I got my vial from. It wasn't cheap for what it is, but I think it's cool.
edit: looks like they also ship to Canada if you live there. I've no idea what the laws are up there, but I'm assuming it's legal if they're willing to ship.
God, what a wonderful thread that was. I've decided to follow and star @mizu@lemmy.world so I can follow up on their future exploits.
Sadly, it doesn't appear that they've posted in quite some time. Hopefully they'll come out of hiding one day and ask more ridiculous questions.
I have a little tritium vial on my keys because I am a clumsy oaf with ADHD and the little greeny glow has been useful a couple of times. It's great when I'm out at night and my keys yeet themselves out of my pocket and land in the darkest possible area.
I mostly got it because it's cool though. Radioluminescence is fukken rad!
I could not have imagined a more fitting name if I had been writing this whole episode as a work or fiction. The world can be so fucking delightful at small scales sometimes.
I just have the 0.6mm nozzles mine came with. I recall hearing something like that, but I've felt that the phat 0.6 lads were good enough for the stuff I'm printing. If that's a limitation, then I hope Prusa can fix it. Seems like it shouldn't be a big deal to make that configurable.
I own a Prusa XL and I love it. it's the most reliable printer I've ever owned by a long shot. The only thing I've been unhappy with is the somewhat lackluster support for Octoprint, but I've heard that others have been able to fully use the printer with the right configuration.
Right, but I can't require a second factor on a different device that operates outside of my primary device's trust store. I'm sure there is some way to make my desktop hit my phone up directly and ask for fingerprint auth before unlocking the local keystore, but that still depends on the security of my device and my trust store. I don't want the second factor to be totally locked to the device I'm running on. I want the server to say, "oh, cool, here's this passkey. It looks good, but we also need a TOTP from you before you can log in," or "loving the passkey, but I also need you to respond to the push notification we just sent to a different device and prove your identity biometrically over there." I don't want my second factor to be on the same device as my primary factor. I don't know why a passkey (potentially protected by local biometric auth) + a separate server-required second factor (TOTP or push notification to a different device or something) isn't an option.
EDIT: I could make it so a fingerprint would decrypt my SSH key rather than what I have now (i.e. a password). That would effectively be the same number of factors as you're describing for a passkey, and it would not be good enough for my organization's security model, nor would it be good enough for me.
I just don't get why I can't use something like TOTP from my phone or a key fob when logging in with a passkey from my desktop. Why does my second factor have to be an on-device biometrically protected keystore? The sites I'm thinking of currently support TOTP when using passwords, so why can't they support the same thing when using passkeys? I don't want to place all my trust in the security of my keystore. I like that I have to unlock my phone to get a TOTP. Someone would have to compromise my local keystore and my phone, which makes it a better second factor in my opinion.
EDIT: like, at work, I ssh to servers all over the damn place using an ssh key. I have to get to those servers through a jump box that requires me to unlock my phone and provide a biometric second factor before it will allow me through. That's asymmetric cryptography + a second factor of authentication that's still effective even if someone has compromised my machine and has direct access to my private key. That's what I want from passkeys.
This is obviously wrong. The children yearn for the mines, not the slaughterhouse. They should be swinging a pickaxe at some pitchblende in an unventilated tunnel after school, not cutting up meat.
(/s obvs, I find the whole "the children yearn for the mines" thing to be just my kind of dark humor.)
This headline is... well, not great. Here's the entire quote from Larian Studios' publishing director:
I dunno. That's hopefully less misleading and confusing? The article really doesn't bring much to the table imo.
Anyways, fuck Ubisoft.