Axiochus

joined 1 year ago
[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I like to imagine that he beat all of them up.

[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago
[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

In my field it's often general journal policy, not an individual choice. It's hit or miss, as it can be easy to guess who the reviewer or author is in a niche field. I personally don't go out of my way to figure out the author's affiliation, even if it can be trivial. Regarding self citations, those are usually obfuscated at the review stage. I'd say that a paper is easy to narrow down to a circle of scholars, but it might be the first paper of a research associate, a throwaway paper by a PI, or a paper that aims to engage those narrow specialists. So is a kind of smoke screen.

[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

I actually robot-fed my kitten from day one, so they basically don't associate me with food at all, just with cuddles and reprimands.

[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Thank God for double blind peer reviews, warts and all.

[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Aren't those the stairs of mourning, i.e. the place where he was executed?

[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Cool! The weight of responsibility of the spiritual guide for a community.

[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Drittes Reich

[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I'm shipping up to Bostonnn

[–] Axiochus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

R.i.p. 😔

0
Requiem - Mozart (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Axiochus@lemmy.world to c/thelyricsgame@lemmy.ca
 
view more: next ›