Atomic

I did not worry every second that I allegedly am about to to live in an authoritarian state.

What are you talking about?

I'm not American, but that was fun to watch. I had my popcorn and everything. It felt like I'm watching Cartman debate Wendy or something.

Do you really believe someone who is still undecided going into last night’s debate is a reasonable person?

It's not just about president it's about party. Someone might not like Trump. But at the same time dislike democratic policies and democrats as a party.

So now the have to decide. Do they go against Republicans due to their candidate? Hearing Kamala debate him might convince them that yeah... ok. They're not THAT bad.. at least they (democrats) are better than him (Trump)

Matrix today, put on the headset!

Debian is the best defense of the incident and I couldn't find the exact opposite way to them by now I am little bit of a political symbol that I am little more about business and I don't want you

I've heard "wallet warrior" been thrown around in gaming communities for people who just pay for high end accounts without having any skill to back it up.

Well, if it's a "normal" touchscreen laptop, I think most Linux distros have support for it out of the box.

If you have a bit of patience. What you could do is simply install Linux on an external drive (usb stick works fine if its large enough) connected to your laptop.

That way you can freely try what works without messing anything up until you've decided.

You might want to be more specific than that... but im running Debian on a Microsoft Surface and It's great. You will need to follow a tutorial on how to install it though. It's a bit more technical than your average Linux installation

No. I'm really not. And as I've explained so many times. There are evidence available to make that conclusion plausible.

The word you are looking for is proof. But you not understanding the difference between evidence and proof is another issue.

Yikes, you really want to strawman this as hard as you can.

Not sure what you're quoting but it ain't me.

There is evidence to draw the conclusion that an estimate of 180k dead is plausible. Everything from the length of the war, the documented lack of aid reaching the region, the documented destruction of medical facilities to the The documented destruction of habital areas.

I understand fully that there are ~40k deaths reported from within. I think it's entierly plausible that the real number of deaths as an indirect cause of the war are far higher than that. Personally I think it's more than plausible. I think it's likely. But I'll stick with plausible just for you.

It is based on evidence.

Evidence that very little aid is reaching Gaza. Evidence that clean water is difficult to come by. Evidence that 35% of their builds are severely damaged or destroyed. Evidence from previous wars and how the population were affected by similar conditions.

With those points of data. Qualified people can make estimations of what they think the number of dead might look like.

But there is no evidence to prove the estimation is correct right until after the war is over.

What you want to say, is that there's no proof. Which is correct. There is no proof for the figure. Because again. It's an estimation. There is a war. We can't go dig up the bodies just yet

We cook our food to kill bacteria.

Ever wondered why domesticated animals tend to become much older than wild animals?