AnalogyAddict

joined 1 year ago
[–] AnalogyAddict@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Point out where I spoke for all women?

I can perfectly handle you saying what is a turn off to you. I just told you I'm glad to be a turn off for you, if you think sheer physical appearance is enough to be attracted.

I'm moving on from this conversation, now. Your emotions are getting in your way here, and I'm not interested in playing Whack-a-Mole on your straw men.

[–] AnalogyAddict@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I find it unattractive to use logical fallacies like ad hominem to try to attack someone because of feeling threatened. But I do find it amusing when such fallacies fall so short. I don't care if I'm attractive to you. I have much more important things to be. Being unattractive to people who would find AI attractive is something I'm rather proud of. It means I'm doing something right.

Fortunately for one of us, insecurity actually isn't one of my faults, or my feelings would be almost as hurt as yours seem to be.

[–] AnalogyAddict@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think it sounds more like a bunch of men feeling threatened by the fact that women find being attracted to imaginary women a pretty big turn off.