Alaknar

joined 1 month ago
[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think it's important to note that the method you linked to only works for Nvidia GPUs.

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This guy is not the president of the United States.

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It’s a common way to say someone was dupes by something, “they bought it” meaning they fell for it.

Mate, are you OK? I know what the phrase means and I'm struggling to see which part of my reply gave you the impression otherwise...

there was antitrust brought under the Biden admin. [link]

What is your argument here, exactly? That Trump appointing an anti-Big Tech person to lead the anti-trust section of the DOJ was... a bad thing... because Biden did stuff for anti-trust...? Hmm?

The point being GOP was only anti big-tech in rhetoric (...) He is either lying, or not paying attention.

Sigh...

Don't take it the wrong way, it's not an attack, just a statement of fact: people like you are the reason democracy is failing.

In most countries democracy has a 4-year turnover. One party comes in, says "we'll do X", gets to do their thing for four years, and then... It turns out that "X" takes 6 years to implement so people like you go "they lied to us, they didn't do X!". Now, the other party sees that and says "oh, trust us, we'll do Y" and "Y" is a bullshit non-issue or a non-solution to an actual issue, but it only takes 3 years to implement, which gives them a nice boost and a potential for re-election.

This creates a vicious cycle of parties becoming more and more populist, saying they'll "solve poverty by increasing minimum wage" (where the actual solution is massive changes in regulation and policy that would take a decade to implement), or "kick out immigrants to give back jobs to true XYZ" (where "true XYZ" don't want to do the jobs that immigrants take, and the solution, again, would be proper regulatory (and executive!) action, but that takes a decade or two to implement). Etc., etc.

Now, back to the point - yes, you're right. A lot of stuff happened during Biden's tenure. But A LOT of that stuff was started by Trump's administration, or the actions of the Trump administration opened the doors for a lot of what Biden did.

Here's a list of some of it:

DOJ Antitrust Lawsuit Against Google (2020)- Focused on Google’s deals with Apple and others to maintain default search engine status, thus harming competitors.

FTC Antitrust Lawsuit Against Facebook (December 2020)- To potentially break up Facebook by forcing it to divest those companies.

DOJ Antitrust Review of Big Tech (2019)- Laid groundwork for later actions, like the 2020 Google lawsuit.

FTC Tech Task Force (2019)- Re-examined acquisitions like Facebook’s of Instagram and WhatsApp.

Trump’s Executive Order on Section 230 (May 2020) to weaken legal protections that shield social media platforms from liability over user content and moderation decisions. - didn’t get much done as actual change would require Congressional action. But it intensified scrutiny of Big Tech.

Other indirect actions: Trump supported conservative-led Congressional hearings and investigations into Big Tech’s political power and influence or pushed the idea that companies like Amazon were harming small businesses and exploiting USPS

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it is trivial for a person to move to an instance who’s ruleset better aligns with their wishes

How?

Can I just move my existing account to a different instance? Or do I need to create a new account on another instance?

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The problem with this, is if he was paying attention AT ALL, it’d be clear that the republican stance “against big tech” was always a lie.

Nobody ever suggested otherwise. I specifically mentioned that myself.

The fact he just bought their BS is enough for me to not trust the company.

He didn't "buy" anything. He didn't become a Republican, WTF are you people talking about? He literally said, that at the time GOP was more anti-Big Tech and pro-consumer than the Democrats and that a specific appointment was a good choice.

Since when does stating facts mean you're "buying someone's BS"?

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately, yes.

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Mods censor EVERYTHING

This is not a Reddit issue, this is a "subreddit I'm subscribed to" issue. I'm not seeing that problem.

The problem I AM seeing, though, that's ACTUALLY making it unusable is how they fucked up the latest UI redesign. Ctrl+Enter no longer works, spellcheck is force-disabled when using the Markdown editor, posts no longer open in a panel, you have to open each one in a separate tab or reload the main feed every single time, everything is slow and clunky... It's just badly written, badly optimised and badly designed overall.

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I will die on this hill - the Proton CEO was right when he praised GOP in the context of the time, and situation.

The situation was: GOP accidentally* going against Big Tech and pro-citizens, while Democrats were defending Big Tech (just to be in opposition-by-default to GOP). Specifically, the CEO's tweet was about how Trump nominating a fairly loudly outspoken anti-Big Tech person to a very high position in the DOJ was a good thing.

The time was: just before Trump 2 took office and showed what a shit-show his admin, and GOP have become.

The guy was ONLY talking about Big Tech and anti-trust policies nothing else. He never said "GOP is good for the US" or "GOP is good for the world", he said "GOP are doing a bunch of anti-trust and anti-Big Tech moves right now and it's good".

People dropping Proton for this reason are the epitome of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

* it was because Trump was throwing a hissy fit at Meta and Twitter for allowing people to express anti-Trump opinions.

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't get it.

They are destroying the planet on top of all the other things.

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, like, come on! Being born in the Middle East? Rookie mistake!

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (28 children)

So do 100% concentrated evil, but they also wipe their arses with the constitution, set up concentration camps, and literally ruin the political and economic position of the US.

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
view more: ‹ prev next ›