Acamon

joined 1 year ago
[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Must make turning corners, parking and dealing with hazards a wild experience.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah, that's how I felt about Jonathan Majors as Kang. "He's great! Got this fun, wild, sensitive vibe, but there's this dark and menacing core lurking beneath." uhuh.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I'd agree with that. If you use you're vast wealth to do awful things then you're an awful person. But I've defintely had moments when a moment of rage or lust or other bad intention has bubbled up inside, and I've wanted to buy a business just to fire the rude person I've argued with, or hire a team of sex workers just to fulfill some weird fantasy. But as a poor normal person those thoughts appear and pass because i can't do anything about them. I'd hope that if I was a billionaire, I'd still take a moment and realise the gap between id urge and superego approved action, but who knows?

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago
[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think 'most' is hyperbole for dramatic effect / increased engagement. "more files than you might think are actually following the zip file structure" isn't as punchy.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

What I think you mean by "natural geography" is just one part of the field. Urban / economic geography (regional dynamics, housing policy, tourism geography, population analysis) and Historical / Social geography (historical urban geography, homelessness, migration, etc) Are big parts of the field of geography. Most of modern geography is interested in both the physical (more geology, climate, biomes, etc) and human aspects, and how they interact.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sorry to be dumb, but which ones are the crt ones?

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

The lol per pixel ratio of this meme was significantly above the mean

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Almost every part of this is wrong. But I suspect op's parents do have better music taste than them.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you mot going to respond the commenters points? He went to the trouble of reading the article, and you've complained that you can't discuss this because people won't listen to what's being said. So here's your chance.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

People act like this hasn't been a thing for over a century...

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Just installed. Looks good. I've been using transdrone and it works well, but your app supports torrent searching, which is very cool.

 

I've seen reports and studies that show products advertised as including / involving AI are off-putting to consumers. And this matches what almost every person I hear irl or online says. Regardless of whether they think that in the long-term AI will be useful, problematic or apocalyptic, nobody is impressed Spotify offering a "AI DJ" or "AI coffee machines".

I understand that AI tech companies might want to promote their own AI products if they think there's a market for them. And they might even try to create a market by hyping the possibilities of "AI". But rebranding your existing service or algorithms as being AI seems like super dumb move, obviously stupid for tech literate people and off-putting / scary for others. Have they just completely misjudged the world's enthusiasm for this buzzword? Or is there some other reason?

 

I feel like I'm encountering weird little tics and problems with my android devices, and those of family and friends. Just simple things where settings don't seem to be consistently applied, or the os switches something back repeatedly. For example, my apps are set to auto update, to use data as well as WiFi, etc, but every month or so I go into Play and see that some random app hasn't been updated in weeks.

Or my friend only gets Signal notifications when they open the app, despite giving full background data use, turning off adaptive battery, etc. My mother uses an alarm app that needs to display over the screen for a feature, but despite me setting that permission repeatedly Android keeps turning it off.

Is this just anecdotal bad luck? Or is all the work to preserve battery life, control background usage, etc led to an OS where the user can't control things reliably? It starting to feel a lot like MS Windows!

 

(I've got a pixel watch 2 and moto edge 40 neo, and some jlab earbuds.)

I usually listen to music on my phone, but recently linked my earbuds to my watch, and the same music played on Spotify sounds massively better on the same earbuds when played via the watch.

I assumed it was because I had installed the jlab app, and it was doing a bad job of meddling with the eq. But after uninstalling it there wasn't a noticeable difference. Is there some other setting I can adjust? Any thoughts on whether it's something my moto is doing wrong or something my pixel watch is doing right?

Its a substantial difference (although I'm not enough of an audiophile to describe it) enough that I'm now mostly playing music via my watch. But it's hitting the battery hard, so I'd rather go back to using my phone!

 

And if so, how do they label headphones, contact lenses etc?

 
 

I've use Twilight for years and love the red filter for using my phone at night. But since getting an AMOLED screen it's started to frustrate me. The way Twilight seems to work means that black also gets a red tint. Previously this was great, but on amoled black is completely dark with no back-light that needs masking with red. So by shifting it red, Twilight is actually making the screen much brighter.

Tldr: Any apps that leave black as black, but give a red tint to all the other colors?

 

Formerly know as Castle Gloom, the castle is situated in a high vantage point in the Ochil hills. It is protected on either side of the castle by two large gorges, through which thunder streams ('burns' in Scots) the Burn of Sorrow and the Burn of Care.

 

Obviously, most social networks have some sort of engagement button for liking/up voting/promoting a piece of content. As well as helping users feel like they're participating, rather than just passively consuming, most networks also use the likes/ups to filter or promote content to other users.

As a dumb noob, what does the up/down vote do in lemmy in particular? Does it actually affect anything beyond changing the number beside the little arrows? I know there's some discussion about lemmy tracking 'karma' even if it's not visible in all clients. Can different instances implement "karma thresholds"? Or auto hide posts that fall beneath a certain down vote ratio?

And more subjectively, what do you feel up/down voting represents? Is it showing agreement with the post? That you want to see more posts like that? That other people should look at the post? Does it matter if this subjective purpose is actually unrelated to what the up votes do in reality?

view more: next ›