AES_Enjoyer

joined 2 months ago
[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Why did you edit the reason for the ban?

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

they are children of people who ran your beloved USSR. Putin's grandpa was a cook

You're absolutely laughable, as I said I disengaged with you already.

Do you not understand your words just don't match anything real?

I'm the only one who provided source information instead of "vibes-based" analysis.

I'm not going to give you any sources

I noticed already, hence me disengaging.

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

"Fascist administration carried out infrastructure (using slave labour) that would create benefit for the companies it was serving" isn't the own fascists think it is.

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm gonna stop engaging with your "I know better than empirical evidence approach based on my vibes of who controlled what". Enjoy bootlicking the corporate overlords that plunge your country in imperialist war, at least now you have bananas and soda, even if people can't afford housing.

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

Really committed to the bit, I see

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The Hungarian Revolution didn't need to be fascist to justify the use of tanks, but yes, the fact that Hungary suffered a US-supported coup is worthy of tanks. The horrors lived in Eastern Europe as a consequence of the dismantling of socialism in the name of "freedom" are unspeakable. Millions of lives lost to unemployment, alcoholism, lack of healthcare, suicide and a myriad more of reasons. Those don't matter I guess, since they're victims of capitalism.

"America bad" by itself almost justifies the use of tanks. Joining the Western World in imperialism, unequal exchange and ultimately genocide, is a crime against humanity, and history books of the future will reflect this. History won't be kind to those who exploited the billions of people of the global south for the selfish gain of a few capitalist overlord.

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know if I would classify him as a POS

What does it take for you to classify a war criminal as a POS?

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 0 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

Doesn't mean you should suck dictators' dicks

Why the homophobic comment though

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

pejorative term for people who supported Kruschev's use of tanks

Funnily enough, didn't it come out two weeks ago from JFK papers that the leader of the Hungarian Freedom Fighters of the Hungarian Revolution was on CIA bankroll? Wow, tankies have been vindicated etymologically? Who woulda thunk

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Fuck tankies and fuck commies

...said the citizen whose decaying world is governed by the sworn enemies of communism: fascists.

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 15 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

A few kinda solved it, namely Soviet Union and Cuba. And libs will never forgive them for it.

[–] AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Any stats about USSR and shares of income, inequality and such are bullshit

The elites didn't formally own anything - well, neither they do in Russia today, but they do control that property and use it freely.

This word [kulak] is a propaganda marker

training technicians to work as bad engineers. Training as in "training dogs". Because the industrialization required some kind of engineers.

Essentially half of your rebuttal is unsourced "no bro, that's not true", when I've given you my sources for the information. You're just showing cognitive dissonance. I was too considerate in my original comments assuming that you'd listen to actual evidence and data. Income inequality figures are bullshit, elites didn't own and they dont own today either (false, oligarchs in modern Russia do own their companies), kulaks didn't exist (Do you think peasants in 1917 majorly owned the lands they were working??), university studies weren't real (I guess the first satellite and human in space and the pioneering research and military industry were just false too)... You're just desperately denying and holding on to your propagandised version of the reality of the Soviet Union, with your greatest issue being that you couldn't buy the soda you wanted, and discarding things like guaranteed housing, while ignoring most of my previous comment.

My bloodline's male part on the Jewish side mostly vanished on the frontlines

My utmost respect to your ancestors who gave their lives in the fight against Nazism. I hope you'll show more respect to them and to the emancipatory project they defended with their lives.

it was approaching something like US south at the same time

Lmao, so essentially slavery, just without the racial component of the US. Please, tell me again: what percentage of the farmers owned in 1917 the lands that they were farming. Oh wait, I forgot you don't care about data.

Why didn't this happen in Finland?

I already explained but here we go again: the USSR was a shining example of what socialism could achieve, right in Europe. If Finland had been colonised, they would have risked a socialist revolution there.

As I said, conversation over. You're not willing to listen.

view more: next ›