0x1C3B00DA

joined 5 months ago
[–] 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

chat apps and systems like Twitter and Mastodon aren't a good place for journalism

Super agree with that. Framing this feature as specific to journalism was a poor choice. The feature is useful for any writer/blogger/joe schmoe on the web

[–] 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago

It's a cool feature, but it sucks that (once again) the mastodon team is taking control of fediverse-wide features and ignoring outside criticism.

https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/30398

[–] 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago

And if some indie dev lasts a little bit longer because I threw away a few dollars, i'm all for it

[–] 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago

Doing an AMA on mastodon would be a horrible experience for everyone. Others have pointed out the obvious difference in reach, blocks/defederation means some ppl may not even be able to participate, participants might never receive questions, users from different instances wouldn't be able to see sibling comments, etc.

[–] 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

PWAs were not liked when they came out.

By some ppl. There were also ppl who did like them. As soon as the desktop support was axed, fans of the feature started complaining immediately.

at the time, people in general did not like PWAs as a concept. Independent of the browser

Again, I think this is a sampling issue, because my experience was the complete opposite.

And one of the key parts of PWA features was the "Progressive" part. The site works without those features and you don't have to use them so removing the support never made much sense to me.

 

This week on Electrek’s Wheel-E podcast, we discuss the most popular news stories from the world of electric bikes and other nontraditional...

 

At the height of the pandemic, farmers were forced to dump millions of pounds of perfectly edible produce. Four years later, they still need help with their surpluses.