UFOs

2681 readers

1 users here now

This community is for discussion surrounding UFOs and Extraterrestrials.

Rules

Be your own moderator
- Think before you post or comment, and use your common sense about what is acceptable. This is a community space and should ultimately be community-driven. Be the community you want to see here.
- If you are here because you want to make fun of or grandstand over all of the silly people who believe that UFO/UAPs may exist, you are not welcome. Just block the community and go about your day.
Be Civil
- No trolling or being disruptive.
- No insults or personal attacks.
- No accusations that other users are shills/agents. If you have some kind of evidence of this, please report instead.
- No hate speech or abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
- No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
- No witch hunts or doxxing.
- No summarily dismissive comments (e.g. "Swamp gas.").
Posts must be related to UFO/UAPs
Avoid duplicate posts
Link posts should contain the linked content and a submission statement
- Submission statements should contain a summary of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, and optionally personal perspectives.
- For short-form content, such as tweets, include the entire text.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

DaughterOfMars@lemmy.world

‘Alien corpses’ shown to Mexican Congress (www.independent.co.uk)

submitted 1 year ago by j4yt33@feddit.de to c/ufos@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“Non-human” alien corpses have been displayed to Mexican politicians at Congress.

The two small alleged alien corpses, retrieved from Cusco, Peru, were presented in windowed boxes in Mexico City on Wednesday, stirring excitement within the UFO conspiracy theorist community.

The event was spearheaded by journalist and ufologist Jaime Maussan, who testified under oath that the mummified specimens are not part of “our terrestrial evolution”, with almost a third of their DNA remaining “unknown”, reported Mexican media.

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] DisappointingIntro@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mr. Maussen is the same guy that found some mummies in Peru, claimed they were alien and it was proven to be mummified children. I wouldn't get too excited by this. If 30% of retrieved DNA was unidentifiable, then 70% was. Not an expert but unidentified genomes are likely to be a result of divergent evolution and/or simply a result of a chemical breakdown over time.

I'd put my money on this guy having a real knack for finding dead kids.

[–] j4yt33@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Absolutely, 30% unidentifiable DNA still means there's 70% identifiable DNA. I still thought it's interesting as The Independent is not a small news outlet and they actually have pictures and without being an expert at all, I find those quite intriguing. Might still be just misshapen human skeletons, I'm actually pretty sure that's what these are. But still, interesting :)

[–] morras@jlai.lu 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We have 90% of our DNA in common with mushrooms.

So a being where its DNA is only 70% similar to us (or whatever that "unindentifiable" means) should be vastly different from any lifeform on Earth.

Therefore, human-like aliens, LOL

[–] lostferret@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've done sequencing and the unidentifiable dna is just stuff that didn't map back to the human genome. For old samples, this is because dna doesn't preserve too well and you end up with super short reads that are too small to map. The computer kicks those out as "unidentifiable". So not "new genes" just chaff from poorly preserved material.

[–] j4yt33@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Absolutely, it doesn't mean that 70% of their DNA is like ours and 30% is something completely different or that 30% of their DNA is still DNA but with a different code to ours or anything like that. They could match 70% of it to known sequences and 30% to nothing, that's all that this means.