this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Gaming

2887 readers
43 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It feels like wasted power. You could at least be earning something off it. The creator can either take a cut if it's free or lump sum for paid.

I've seen a few idle games take up a lot CPU resources, not necessarily GPU so it had me wondering. Why not make it mine?

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maddier1993@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Contrary to popular belief, electric power usage is not wasted if the PC is idle. PC draws more power when it is working at 100% vs. When it is idle.

It's like people switch off kettles or ovens that are not running... but if a kettle/oven is not running then it is not pulling power.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Right... Hence why idle games draw significantly more power than when a computer isn't running it.

This is about idle games. Not a PC at idle.

[–] Sirence@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago

If the idle game is running at 100% there is no power left to also crypto mine. If the idle game runs at 10% you could use 90% for mining but then you would pay for 100% energy usage instead of 10%. You'd probably end up paying more than you'd mine.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Because it would be inefficient and people don't like it when you use their computing power for your own gain. I should mention that there are known instances of this happening. A site being compromised and a JavaScript mining applet has been added to the site.

Also, Firefox blocks cryptominers by default.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

inefficient

Right... however ANY efficiency when already using a rig for an idle game is literally more efficient, hence why I wondered.

Also it wouldn't matter whether the mining benefits the owner or user. In reality if the user wants to try with the CPU, they'll be making $1 for every $20 wasted in power letting their computer idle hard. However that's still $19 rather than $20. You could at least give the creator the crypto rather than yourself if it's free which is kinda my point.

It's literally a case of I'd prefer nobody benefit rather than someone else.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You do know that PCs don't consume all the power when idle right?

I have a server with 2x800W power supplies and it idles at 110w. If I were to run a crypto miner on it my power bill will go up far more than the game creator will make.

The only winner in small scale crypto mining is the power company.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This isn't about a computer on idle... This is about a computer running a game non stop that people think is Idle... When it's not. It's often running a game doing massive number calculations regularly. Sometimes showing hundreds to thousands of separate things on the screen constantly.

I think a lot of the comments here just don't seem to understand how many resources an Idle game can actually take up lol.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

And if you mine crypto at the same time, it either uses even more resources, or the game runs slower.