this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

32290 readers
530 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link

  • Chinese diplomat’s comments at ICJ appear to endorse armed struggle against Israel in what analyst calls an ‘unanticipated shift’ in stance
  • However, others say comparisons between speech at World Court and Mao-era rhetoric are overstated, noting Beijing still favours a two-state solution
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Salph@infosec.pub 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The USSR would've simply directly funded and/or militarily supported Hamas, Hezbollah, etc. And they did do so with with the PFLP until the USSR was overthrown.

Though ig two superpowers militarily supporting opposide sides has the risk of just turning the place into a warzone like what happened with Afghanistan.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

I feel like this is exactly what's happening. China isn't jumping in because their pro-palenstine. Theyre jumping in because they're anti US. This will only drag on and worsen the conflict as it becomes one giant proxy war.