this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35579 readers
382 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That is probably a slam dunk (minor) discrimination lawsuit. Your circumstances of birth, including the date, are not something you can be judged for.

Follow up with your ID or Birth certificate and ask "Excuse me?"

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It wouldn't get anywhere in the US. Age is the closest protected class, but only applies to over 40 in the US. Discrimination based on month and day of birth isn't actually illegal.

[–] Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I honestly think there's a gray area here and it's worth talking to a lawyer if anything. There are certainly some protections for peoples under 40. Being denied a promotion because you're "too young" is certainly a protection. The catch is you have to prove it.

This case is easy to prove though if there are any laws over this.

Edit: but now that I think about it, this is only really a protection if you're already hired at the place. If you just slam the door on people before they can get in, discrimination seems to be legal.

[–] pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What about star sign? That's got to be illegal, and it's p close to this

[–] GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They listed the protected classes. Which one is astrology?

[–] pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah yeah not protected, but same could be said for requiring blond hair or blue eyes. Still discrimination

I am not a lawyer

[–] NateSwift@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They did specifically list genetics

[–] pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

How is that different from any other accident of birth that can't be changed? People really do discriminate based on when you were born:

Not hard to extrapolate a case from this. Imagine a landlord refusing to rent because you're a "scorpio" or an employer turning you down because they're looking for a "dog" person.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

They should not censor the company name.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What always ticks me off beyond reason in mails like these is the "we genuinely appreciate your time and effort in...."

Fuck. You. With. An. Umbrella.

You don't appreciate shit, you're full of shit, yet you're too shit to even just say what you really want to say: fuck you, we don't give a damn. Because being actually honest might also be bad and cost money.

Companies like there are the worse and should all burn in hell

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thank you for the opportunity!

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I appreciate the time and effort it took to reply

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I'd rather get a rejection email than eternally wondering why an AI filtered me out

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

It's not the email that bugs me, it's the fake politeness and language like "but we care! We really do!"

[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

This can't be real. There are so many red flags this is fake. 1) Everything is censored. 2) GIS (Google image search) lookup only shows reddit and linkedin. The linkedin post is just as vague "learned a colleague received this!" 3) It's too good to be true. it plays on current fears. 4) It's just so dumb.

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

1 is in no way a red flag, don't put other's personally identifying information on the Internet.

[–] orphiebaby@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I fucking hate people like you.

"Everything on Reddit/Lemmy is fake and gay. Here's my evidence."

All evidence easily has an explanation, most of it laughably so.

What do idiots who claim everything is fake get out of it? To troll the OP? Or do you just want to spread your misery?

[–] Hotchillipotato@slrpnk.net 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I fucking despise the fact that AI almost exclusively is responsible for throwing out 99% of all resumes before they reach a human being

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This isn't just AI. AI doesn't care about jokes or memes or "professionalism." This was either a review by an actual human that didn't realize people are born on April 20th or an AI told to reject resumes with that date in it.

Either way, it's a really dumb person that set this rule.

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What is wrong with April 20th?

[–] RidderSport@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I can only think of international cannabis day and Hitler's birthday

[–] the_seven_sins@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

*international: in Nations not writing dates as 20.4.

[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I would spam them with even more "inappropriate" but equally plausible applications out of sheer pettiness and the vain hope that a real person would see it and realize that using AI to screen job applications is an awful idea.

[–] seSvxR3ull7LHaEZFIjM@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

I don't think that would be a good idea. It would certainly be satisfying though.