this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32046 readers
473 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptman@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

Electricity vs. energy. Electricity is only part of energy.

[–] considine@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And to celebrate that fact, Europe is joining the US in imposing massive tariffs on China's electric vehicles and solar cells. Yay.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I largely welcome restricting massproduced mobile surveillance machines made by a chinese hq'd company. Don't misunderstand me I hate teslas too for this, but we don't need more of this shit.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago

We are not restricting the surveillance, just making it more expensive.

What we need is forced inspections of the source code and other ways to actually mitigate the security risks.

Just making things more expensive does nothing to mitigate actual the risk.

[–] ArrogantAnalyst@infosec.pub -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

That’s a good thing imo. We do this so we can build up an industry for these things at home. That’s an important long term goal, too. If the last years have shown us anything it’s that being solely dependent on another state for certain critical stuff is a bad idea. And I’d say this is especially true for China.

Edit: btw German talking here, not American.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s a good thing imo. We do this so we can build up an industry for these things at home.

Unfortunately, most countries haven't really done much to invest into the production of solar cells in their home country in the last twenty years (Germany is a noteworthy exception), so why would they start now?

Realistically, imposing tariffs on chinese PV cells will only slow the energy transition, instead of building up domestic production.

[–] ArrogantAnalyst@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gandalf, hast du gerade auf nen 2 Monate alten Beitrag von mir geantwortet? :)

Ja, ist ja immer noch relevant. :-)

[–] nekandro@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Do you want to know how many cars in China are from European car manufacturers?

Rebalancing trade is not some big bogeyman.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Pretty ironic that it took Putin invading Ukraine to make Europe invest into renewables.

And not to save the planet but to be less dependent on energy from fossil fuels...

I don't like being cynical like this, but:

Putin's war really did something for the climate.

[–] solo@kbin.earth 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I suppose greenwashing works? in the sense creates favorable stats, not that it helps the environment.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You really don't like to admit even the smallest bit of positive news, do you?

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Liek the other commenter said, this could be read as 70% of electricity still relyingnon non renewables, which is a bad metric.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Reasonable people understand that transition is not an overnight process. Also adoption isn't linear which is why they say the first third is the biggest half.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Overnight? We've been implementing and talking about renewables since I was in high school, which was like more than 10 years ago already. Only 30% in 10 years is VERY slow. Being happy with 30% is not being reasonable, it's being in denial.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Infrastructure takes time, now factories and infrastructure is in place we'll see faster installation rates.

[–] solo@kbin.earth -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Obviously I don't see this as good news because I can't see how ecology and capitalism can work together, unless it is greenwashing. Environmentalism/ecology/etc want sustainability, capitalism is all about eternal growth of the business, and I don't see corporations and other financial entities changing their business model? Do you?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Capitalism is helping destroy fossil fuels. Solar and hydro electricity is cheaper than fossil fuels.

Government subsidies - interference with he capitalist market - are propping up the oil industry (and the meat industry, while we're at it).

Properly regulated capitalism is perfectly capable of fixing the climate crisis. Ecology and capitalism work together when going green is cheaper than using fossil fuels.