this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

37708 readers
337 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SamVergeudetZeit@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Isnt the EU working on something requiring Whatsapp to open up cross messaging for Signal and co.? If they do, there is no reason to be on wa anymore.

[–] Plume@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, if WhatsApp eventually fails, can we accept for at least just this once, to move on to something that is not proprietary and owned by a large company, please? Please, for the love of everything can we please for once move on to something that is open source and for just this once not repeat the same fucking mistake over and over again?

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope. Ease to use will always triumph over open source

[–] Plume@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's not easy about Signal, though? :c

[–] theonyltruemupf@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

Signal needs automatic cloud backups so badly. They're encrypted anyways, why not allow it as an option?

I've used it for years now and it's great and I managed to get all my friends to install it. But manual backups are basically impossible for the average user. Also it'd be nice if we could bulk export pictures more easily.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryWhatsApp might still deploy ads on the platform alongside the app’s Instagram Stories-like Status feature, company head Will Cathcart recently said in an interview.

As pointed out by TechCrunch, Cathcart stated that WhatsApp ads could show up in different places within the app, including the newer Channels feature and statuses, though no timeline was provided for the change.

In the Brazilian publication Folha De S.Paulo, the interviewer asked Cathcart if WhatsApp would continue to be free and without ads.

Cathcart responded that WhatApp will not have ads within the inbox or in the “messaging experience.” Cathcart also added that Channels could charge people to subscribe, and the owners could promote ads for it within Channels.

The Meta-owned messaging app has looked for ways to plaster ads in the app starting as early as 2018, when the company (then known as Facebook) looked to put ads in the Status feature.

However, in 2020, it seemed there was some internal fear about flipping the switch on ads and how privacy-focused users would react, so the delay continued, but plans for ads in the feature remained on the docket.


Saved 0% of original text.

[–] maggio@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] WastedJobe@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

It's trying its best ok

[–] lichtmetzger@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

The day that happens I can hopefully uninstall this thing already. Most of my friends use it, they're really big here in Europe. Pretty hard to move to another app.