this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
1113 points (98.9% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2600 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Multiple parties are jockeying for position in the aftermath of France's seismic snap election. The leftist New Popular Front (NPF) insists its ideas should be implemented.

France's left wing New Popular Front (NPF) - now the largest group in parliament - has called for a prime minister who will implement its ideas including a new wealth tax and petrol price controls.

The leftist alliance secured the most seats in the recent French elections but fell short of the 289 needed for a majority in the National Assembly, France's lower house of parliament.

President Emmanuel Macron's Together bloc came in second and Marine Le Pen's far-right National Rally (RN) party finished third.

France's parties are now jockeying for position and it's unclear exactly how things will shake out, but the NPF has insisted it will implement its radical set of ideas.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


France's left wing New Popular Front (NPF) - now the largest group in parliament - has called for a prime minister who will implement its ideas including a new wealth tax and petrol price controls.

The leftist alliance secured the most seats in the recent French elections but fell short of the 289 needed for a majority in the National Assembly, France's lower house of parliament.

President Emmanuel Macron's Together bloc came in second and Marine Le Pen's far-right National Rally (RN) party finished third.

France's parties are now jockeying for position and it's unclear exactly how things will shake out, but the NPF has insisted it will implement its radical set of ideas.

It is possible that President Macron - who called the snap election in a bid to counter the rise of the far-right - could seek a deal with more moderate elements of the NFP.

His government last week suspended a decree that would have diminished workers' rights to unemployment benefits, which has been interpreted as a gesture toward the left.


The original article contains 388 words, the summary contains 174 words. Saved 55%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 3 points 4 months ago

https://www.tax-the-rich.eu/

Tax them. Tax the fuck out of their income and wealth.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago
[–] miridius@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (12 children)

Can we get a non Murdoch source on this?

This is not a tax on the rich, it's a tax on the upper middle class.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

The really wealthy don't take income. Instead they park their wealth in stocks and trust funds and leverage those as collateral for cheap loans from their buddies at the bank.

I thought communists were intelligent but this thread is ~~devoid of any intelligence.~~ quite cheery about something that won't even impact any capitalist.

Don't you all know what "Capital"ist means?

An income tax is a tax on the working class.

~~You morons should stop salivating and start eating more dried fruits.~~

Edit: I realize calling people morons is a bit too much. Sorry about that. I was just miffed by a few who were cheering on punishing their own class. It's so hard to find class solidarity in this day and age.

[–] intelisense@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Income from capital can be, and is, taxed differently. In the U.K. there is Capital Gains Tax, for example. Why not adjust this instead of income tax?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I don't know how France classifies "income", so it could be good at capturing income. It's our own fault when something that is obviously "income" doesn't technically count, in principle a tax system can capture everything that makes sense to count.

In the US, along with wages, interest income and dividend income also count as "regular" income and are taxed appropriately. Capital gains is... weirder and this is the first area ripe for opportunity to reform to capture "rich guy income is different than normal guy income", as long as it is intelligent about it (e.g. if you said, without qualification, all capital gains are taxed like crazy, then suddenly selling your house as part of moving becomes an unreasonable burden, which is why it already has an exemption, but just an example to say vaguely why we have to be careful about capital gains).

Then you get to the borrowing you mention, and I've seen a pretty reasonable approach to capture that as "income", in theory: https://equitablegrowth.org/closing-the-billionaire-borrowing-loophole-would-strengthen-the-progressivity-of-the-u-s-tax-code/

TL;DR: Currently borrowing doesn't count as realizing gains, change it so that borrowing counts as "selling" the stock, further mandating that the cost basis of all identical stock is a specific way rather than letting the shareholder pick and choose their most favored cost basis.

I'd be willing to concede some tax break on repayment of such a loan to reconcile "real income" being exchanged for it down the road, but at that point I think it would largely be academic because suddenly there's no point in borrowing against the stock rather than just selling it outright.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›