this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
79 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4138 readers
28 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rah@feddit.uk 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wehay! \o/

the National Farmers' Union (NFU) said removing the deadline would mean claims would "continue to disrupt many farm businesses for years to come"

My heart bleeds for the poor businesses having to be patient while councils take the time to properly record human beings' ancient rights to walk over land.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 23 hours ago

I wish the NFU would decide what the hell their priorities are and then stick to them for 5 minutes. They seem to swing wildly from issue to issue, without ever really improving things for farmers.

I grew up on a farm and we had some tracks through our fields, it was a total non issue as long as people kept dogs on leads. One time we had a helicopter land in one of our fields and even that wasn't a problem, everything sprung back up after a while. Although immediately afterwards everything did kind of look like a mini nuke had gone off.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 10 points 1 day ago

“continue to disrupt many farm businesses for years to come”

Or they could you know.

Assume the right of way exists and plan to work within it.

If the potential of it being a righr of way is effecting them in any way. Then they must know where ir is being debated.

If they are choosing to fight it. The doubt is entirly their creation.

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 8 points 1 day ago

Our stalwart guardians of the land right there, we make them work so hard for their tax free inheritance

[–] lud@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You guys should get a right of way law.

We don't have public paths like that because you are allowed to walk wherever you want except very close to people's homes and in people's gardens.

You are even allowed to walk across grazing fields actively being roamed by farm animals. You obviously have to close the gate behind you though.

[–] Shezzagrad@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

For some reasons England always seems to be behind Scotland in such social issues

[–] UncleArthur@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Won't somebody think of all the wealthy landowners, having to put up with being treated like ordinary people?

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, that’s kind of standard procedure in the UK, innit?

[–] UncleArthur@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It certainly was over the past 14 years, yes.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was thinking more about the whole monarchy thing, going back to ... forever?

[–] UncleArthur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

There is that too, of course!

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While I've been updating open street map I've also taken the time to report right off way violations via my councils web portal. The problem is most of the paths around here are permissive national park paths and there is no canonical catalog available digitally to cross check against. I don't know if they should also be registered as a right of way?

[–] darko8472@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If in doubt, I’d say register them. It’ll be investigated then and them added to the digital register they’re creating if it is supposed to be a public path, and if not, at least someone notified them to look into it. If nobody tells them then it’s at risk of losing public access.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

There's a public access right of right by a property owned by one of the Trump's around me. I've made extra sure to register it just to irritate them.

Next time I walk past it I must remember to take a picture, because it is quite spectacularly tasteless.