this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
245 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
2694 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

blurb:

So apparently buying a high speed camera wasn't enough, because after two videos with it I decided to build my own, but 5 orders of magnitude faster…

In this video I'm filming the motion of light as it flies across my garage at… well, the speed of light! It's fast. So fast that even with my best setup so far, I get 18 frames of video from one end of the room to the other, and those frames have a lot of temporal blur so realistically each "frame" is actually kind of an average of the information that by right should belong to 5-10 frames. It's a mess, but it works.

I'm using the technique from the electricity waves video where I used repeated oscilloscope measurements synced after the fact to produce "videos" of electricity moving down a wire. The only difference is that instead of measuring electricity waves, I'm measuring light emitted by a laser, bouncing off the wall, traveling to my camera, and landing in the window of a photomultiplier tube. UNLIKE the electricity waves video, this setup (thankfully) is automated, and an optics assembly slews across angle space, building up a 3d dataset of video, collecting all the time information from each pixel sequentially.

It's a really fun project that I've wanted to do for a long time, and just recently got pulled together.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 days ago

Once you go 1mil fps you can't go back

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 0 points 5 days ago

all cameras watch light move, it's all they do

[–] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you liked this definitely checkout some of his other videos. At the level of work that he does you have to have a really solid model of reality and a lot of learned experience of how to measure and manipulate at extreme scales. He makes it look easy but this kind of thing really isn't. Just a lot of fun seeing such a talented and educated person do a really neat demonstration.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Nice, I remember encountering a sales pitch for an earlier version of this sort of device:

https://youtu.be/RXJKdh1KZ0w?si=xxQJwvBtMWTTyJF_

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

The description that boiled down to, it squeaks, was really well written.

Also it was released on the perfect date.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 week ago

I just watched this a few hours ago and it's really cool! I never thought something of this speed would be possible in a garage with $1k or so in parts.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I remember this being a thing several years ago. The researchers in the video I originally saw used a Coke bottle.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah and they stuck a label on the coke bottle presumably because some lawyer was worried about unintentional product endorsement.

"Hey light moves through their bottles that means it's a good product."

[–] sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago

Yes he talks about that in the video. The researchers used $500k+ of equipment. He built a similar thing for under $1k