this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
10 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32559 readers
558 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, everyone with a decent amount of content will just pick Wordpress and move on. It works, it’s reliable, it’s well supported and will keep running for decades at least.

[–] Norgur@fedia.io 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And once you have found your specific collection of plugins that happen not to put the exact features you need behind a paywall but others, you ain't touching those either.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

And once you have found your specific collection of plugins that happen not to put the exact features you need behind a paywall but others, you ain’t touching those either.

And this is why, when I'm investigating phishing links, I've gotten used to mumbling, "fucking WordPress". WordPress itself is pretty secure. Many WordPress plugins, if kept up to date, are reasonably secure. But, for some god forsaken reason, people seem to be allergic to updating their WordPress plugins and end up getting pwned and turned into malware serving zombies. Please folks, if it's going to be on the open internet, install your fucking updates!

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I have to say, I'm so over WordPress that those static site generators are looking pretty sweet right about now.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Pshaw... just write it in raw HTML. It's an incredibly legible markup language. I talk to my spouse in HTML just to stay sharp.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 1 points 5 months ago

As the author of an obscure static site generator. I feel called out.

My personal blog currently has one (1) post. It's about how to get started blogging with my SSG. Oops.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

My blog posts went up 3∞ once I dumped jekyll for a premade blogging site

[–] topherclay@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Shouldn't that X axis really be "percentage" instead of "number" for this to make any sense at all?

[–] Turun@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago

Alternatively the y axis could be "blog posts not about ..."

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I hate how oddly specific "Moved from Jekyll to Hugo people" is, mostly because that's exactly what I did as well. I don't use it to write any blog posts though. It's more a "Here's a list of things I've created"-generator.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 1 points 5 months ago

I set up my site with Jekyll this year, and I have one blog post about how to set up a Jekyll blog.

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There are too many blogs and posts.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 1 points 5 months ago

Are there? I think they're super handy for just.... Having information. Easily discoverable by search engines, and much more coherent than following a forum thread.

[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I made a static site with Hexo a few years back. I thankfully didn't make any "Get started with Hexo" posts but I did only really use it for a few months. I think that puts me in the cluster with the "switch from Jekyll to Hugo" people. Now it just sits there, absorbing some money every two years for the "personal website tax".

Shame too, I constantly think I need to get back to it. Hexo is nice, popular with Chinese users I think. I don't recall now why I liked it over Jekyll or Hugo, but I've always loved an underdog. Once I got the hang of using it, it was very customizable and fun to work with.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 months ago

I think the "Moved from Jekyll to Hugo" dot has an implicit catchment area around it, which includes people who don't technically fit that description, but they're close. I've used neither Jekyll nor Hugo, but the fact I understood that archetype meant I felt pulled in by the gravity of that point.