this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Risa

6912 readers
10 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] notgold@aussie.zone 2 points 5 months ago

No man is an island

[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How are you going to have two for Janeway but no mention of siskos war crimes or martial law. Smdh

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because I can live with it.

[–] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I have a problem with the Kelvin timeline. Specifically how they depicted the Kobayashi Maru sequence. No, I don't care if Spock programmed it. My issue is that Kirk's behavior stank. He straight up cheated, but even worse, he was smug about it. That didn't show leadership potential at all. That was conduct unbecoming of an officer.

I'd always had it in my head that Kirk simply disagreed with the test philosophically. It's a simple scene to set up. Kobayashi Maru tests officers to see how they deal with a losing path in a simulation of a deterministic universe, but especially to reveal the quality of their character. But Kirk doesn't believe in fate. He believes in a quantum universe, where infinite possibilities spring from the vacuum every instant. In my mind, Kirk wouldn't simply reprogram the hostile ships' shields to drop at an exact moment, then just line up his shots. That's still determinism! Instead he would subtly reprogram the simulation to account for random chance, and depend upon his skill to beat the odds against whatever the scenario might throw at him. Examining his changes to the code would reveal not a spoiled rotten, cheating, nepotism brat, but a confident leader with a fundamental difference in personal philosophy for approaching the Universe, and furthermore, who simultaneously argued that the Kobayashi Maru was a flawed exercise, while generously offering a patch to improve it. That's captain material.

That scene would have made me lose all respect for Kirk if I regarded it as canon, so I can't. I would never follow a man like that into the unknown, no matter his supposed tactical brilliance. No disrespect to any of the actors. It's just bad writing. Beyond that, I've got no problem with Kelvin beyond minor quibbles.

[–] beccaboben@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Specify if comic sans! You got me!

[–] xyguy@startrek.website 1 points 5 months ago

Hello, I would like to complain that filling out a form to complain is exactly the kind of thing that Gene Roddenberry would be against so I refuse to do it. /s

[–] QuantumStorm@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What if I don't like the new movies because jj Abrahms can't direct for shit?

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Try Beyond. He had basically no involvement.

[–] QuantumStorm@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I've seen it, it's definitely the best one.

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The one where Kirk dies. I don't think I need to explain further.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago
[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Klingon continuity is the only thing on here that can get me riled.

Faith of the Heart is... whatever. What Janeway did to Tuvix, I definitely wish didn't happen that way, but I can get over it.

But dammit stop fucking up Klingons, please. TOS gets a pass (and Enterprise, whatever its other problems, retconned a continuity fix for that.) But every Klingon fuckup after that is inexcusable. (Some more inexcusable than others.)

(Sorry. Sorry. I'll go take ten deep slow breaths now.)

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah the Klingons changed over time, but once you they have a Klingon in the regular cast it's kinda set at that point.

Worf is THE Klingon now. All other Klingons will be compared to Worf from here on out. Sure there can still be some variance, but if they stray too far off from Worf, they're asking people to choose which is the real Klingon: Worf or whatever they're putting up on the screen now. The answer will always be Worf is the real Klingon, and the new version is not a real Klingon.

It's just how it is, and it's really insane they tried to stray from Worf too much under the excuse that Klingons were changed previously. Yeah they were changed previous to a Klingon being a regular cast member on two popular Trek series.

[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Which fuckup, except for DIS season 1?

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Any time they bleed red instead of fuchsia is an unforgivable violation of the sacred canon.

[–] toddestan@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No checkbox for Wesley Crusher? 🤔

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago

Checkbox for annoying minor character with limited screen time

[–] match@pawb.social 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I dislile TNG because Q. I will be arguing with dissenters in the comments

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I disagree - you dislike TNG for completely different reasons.

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 5 months ago

Shit. You got me.

[–] CannedTuna@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wait, people don’t like Faith of the Heart?

[–] JimmyChanga@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

People detest Faith of the Heart

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 1 points 5 months ago

People with no faith of the heart