this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
151 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39385 readers
2221 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A U.S. court blocked Rupert Murdoch’s attempt to amend his family trust to give control of his media empire to his son Lachlan, deeming it a "carefully crafted charade" favoring Lachlan over his siblings.

The trust is currently set to equally divide control among Murdoch’s four eldest children after his death.

The ruling highlighted bad faith efforts by Rupert and Lachlan and was welcomed by the other siblings.

Murdoch and Lachlan plan to appeal the decision, which has sparked internal family tensions likened to the TV drama Succession.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Did rupert accidentally raise some children that aren't cartoonishly ghoulish?

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, that's why he's trying to amend it for the one that is similarly ghouly.

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 21 points 2 weeks ago

How much more can this ghoul shrivel?

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I hope his children destroy his estate through their greed.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago

I'd hope his children would heel-turn and dismantle his empire after deciding they don't want to be an evil misanthropic Palpatine like him....

...but I'm a bit of an idealist. =\

[–] buttfarts@lemy.lol 2 points 2 weeks ago

It is a moot point because ghouls cannot die

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What kind of name is Lachlan?!

[–] interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Lachlan is a masculine name of Irish origin, meaning “from the land of lakes” or “from the fjord land.” It is an Anglicized version of the Gaelic and Scottish Lachlann, which means “warrior from the land of the lochs” with loch meaning “lake” or “fjord” and lann translating to “land.”

Google is your friend.