this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
180 points (95.0% liked)

Fediverse

28576 readers
441 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We were busy those nights, and if you didn't get the memo it's best to stop asking questions while you still can.

[–] Blaze 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I still doubt we make 9 millions posts per day, there is another graph dedicated to comments, which has a much tinier drop on Thanksgiving: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/dailystats

[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This could actually make sense if those bot posts that mirror reddit subs are included in this number since those don't really get any comments

[–] Blaze 1 points 3 hours ago

Indeed. And as Reddit was probably quieter, the mirroring bots would be too

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, I always thought of OP as someone in the Lemmy's loop. I guess it doesn't know everything...

[–] Blaze 2 points 18 hours ago

I still doubt we make 9 millions posts per day, there is another graph dedicated to comments, which has a much tinier drop on Thanksgiving: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/dailystats

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ik Lemmy is a small social media,is this why I feel like Lemmy is dead.

[–] isles@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We've been conditioned by endless scrolls, for sure.

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 3 points 20 hours ago
[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 108 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I hate the fact that the vertical axis starts at 7 million, making the drop seem deceptively large

[–] ekky@sopuli.xyz 24 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Seems fine to me, the axes are easy to understand and there would be a lot of unnecessary whitespace otherwise. Though, it does require some reading comprehension, and that one actually looks at it and not just skims over.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This reading comprehension joke it overused and it doesn't even make sense here. It's well-known that you need at least one of those little zigzag indicators when the graph doesn't start at 0 in most cases to avoid people misinterpreting the graph and to make it much more visually clear.

[–] ekky@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I was of the impression that reading a graph also required understanding of regular writing/reading, but I'm no native speaker, so I'll gladly stand corrected.

I'm not sure what you mean by "one of those little zigzag indicators", do you perhaps mean leap/break in data denoted by the "Squiggle"? I don't think any data below 7m is included in this graph, so, if I understand you correctly, then that wouldn't be a proper use of said squiggle.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Yes, I mean an axis break to denote that part of the axis has been omitted. Using it to show a gap between 0 and the lowest included data in the dataset is very common and is a proper use even according to your own source:

A zigzag on the line of the x- or y-axis in a line or a bar graph indicating that the data being displayed does not include all of the values that exist on the number line being used

Beginning the Y axis at 0 and using an axis break to go from there to 7 million allows you to see the same amount of detail as you can in the OP, while visually signalling to the reader that the scale on that axis does not show a full 0 to 10 million range. This increases the chance that they'll read the graph correctly. You can justifiably blame someone for reading it wrong, but the point of a graph is to communicate, so minimizing the chance for misinterpretation is a good idea.

[–] hikaru755@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

I agree that this way of displaying the data is appropriate, but it would be nice to have a very visible indicator of this. Some kind of highlighted "fold" line or something at the very bottom of the chart, maybe. If I can deduce the units from context, and the trend is more interesting than absolute numbers, then I'm not going to look at the axes most of the time

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Friday Saturday right?

We're all lemmying for the weekend

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Seems like a major server not reporting their numbers.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 70 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A 20% drop in use on American Thanksgiving doesn't seem even remotely outlandish to me

[–] Blaze 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I still doubt we make 9 millions posts per day, there is another graph dedicated to comments, which has a much tinier drop on Thanksgiving: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/dailystats

[–] shottymcb@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago

I'm pretty sure ThePicardManuever posts 9 million times a day.

[–] blibla@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

this looks more like total posts tbh

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Well, yeah. Posters actually put in effort. Commenters are lazy people who just shit out their terrible opinions.

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Yea well, that’s just like, your opinion, man

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Commenters are the worst.

Especially the ones that have custom profiles with names and shit.

Like Bro you aren't fooling anyone, we all know you aren't really a squid that flies.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

you can have profile pictures??

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For sure; I sure wasn't on my phone at all that day, and I'm usually on Lemmy daily. Too busy cooking and mingling with family.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's Thanksgiving. Either a massive drop in posters due to travel or family or whoever was sending the data was similarly out.

[–] SatyrSack 7 points 2 days ago

I had definitely noticed things were more quiet than usual on English Lemmy, so I figured it was just the Americans being busy with that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Something's odd with the numbers from fediverse observer. Numbers shown in monthly graphs should be about 30 times higher than numbers shown in daily graphs, but they are about the same

[–] Blaze 1 points 18 hours ago

Well spotted

[–] wiki_me@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I always assumed its daily reporting of monthly active users. the nodeinfo format that is used for reporting the data does not show daily active users iirc (it is seemingly capable of reporting weekly users).

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Its probably the average number per day in a month(the total number divided by 30)

[–] jace525@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Thanksgiving?

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago

Sorry. That was me. I ate them all.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's Thanksgiving. A lot of people visiting with friends/family. Idk how to access the numbers but I'd imagine last year was about the same

[–] Blaze 7 points 2 days ago

I still doubt we make 9 millions posts per day, there is another graph dedicated to comments, which has a much tinier drop on Thanksgiving: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/dailystats

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This should say total posts, not average, right?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I am thinking it is probably comments and not posts as well.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bruhbeans@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We need to post harder, not smarter

[–] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Probably just a reporting bug. Comments stayed consistent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Assuming it’s not a bug, maybe Americans busy with Thanksgiving? I know I was on less as a result

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Haha, I did. I still posted a few, but I was out of town with family for days and was barely on my phone.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›