this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

707 readers
178 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

But the transaction faced numerous financial, regulatory and operational hurdles, including the assumption of Intel’s more than $50 billion in debt. It likely would have drawn a lengthy and arduous antitrust review, including in China, which is a key market for both companies.

Qualcomm would have had to handle Intel’s money-losing semiconductor manufacturing unit, a business where it has no experience.

Sounds like Qualcomm got a little bit ahead of itself during their initial inquiries about acquiring Intel.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

When this first got announced, I remember reading a comment on here saying something along the lines of, Qualcomm has zero interest in purchasing Intel but they do want to look at where they can hurt them the most so they really go under.