this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
-2 points (25.0% liked)

linuxmemes

20741 readers
805 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

My lower res, lower DPI display from my old Dell laptop looks much more sharp and crisp than the fancy pants Framework 13 high res display.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pizzazz@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah totally the customer's fault for wanting a nice display in friggin 2024, certainly not the software's which still has no proper support for it.

[–] jg1i@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Exactly! All I want is a nice display in 2024—and Framework chooses a garbage display with known issues.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

No, YOU chose the software with known issues.

[–] kaea@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

2K + KDE + Wayland works like a charm

[–] utubas@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

How dare you use modern technology in current year?

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

How dare you use standard display tech on any commercial laptop bought within the last 5+ years. You should be like me, vastly superior in every human way, with my old tech. I am very smart.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Just like the teacher at school who kept turning all computers' screen resolutions to 640x480 because the text was too small.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago

Fun fact: Instead of implementing scaling settings for RDP, Microsoft just uses lower resolution on its Android RDP client and then upscales that to fit the whole screen.
Which is why the official client is so blurry compared to e.g. aFreeRDP by default.

[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

This is my boss, except he uses 1024*768...

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Mac OS has has this nailed down basically perfectly for over 10 years now, even windows has been great in the last 5+ years. Not having scaling done right in the age of 4k displays being cheap is a sin.

[–] 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

HiDPI is pretty good though, I'm running Fedora Workstation (GNOME) on a 4K 14" Thinkpad X1 Yoga with 2.5x scaling. Everything looks crisp except for a few applications like Audacity and Minecraft.

[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A lot of apps still have issues and it just takes one personally important one to make the whole thing not worth it.

[–] superfes@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

My laptop is at 150%, my external display is at native resolution, like god intended.

[–] PainInTheAES@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Use KDE, especially Plasma 6. Hasn't been an issue for me FW13 12Gen Intel since the last few Plasma 5 releases. I tried GNOME for a while but it can go pound sand.

[–] PlexSheep@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

Works for me with a framework 12 on LMDE6 with plasma5/Wayland. I probably did some configuring and forgot.

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago

I'm rawdogging my QHD on 14" at native resolution. 10pt font. Sue me

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So, does Linux just not support those displays?

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, electron, xwayland, GNOME cause problems.

KDE with fractional scaling on Wayland works well.

Not sure about GNOME today, but they hid it away in the past and forcing 120%/150% made everything blurry

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, macOS has been handling high-dpi displays with zero issues since 2012.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is just a theory but I assume they just dont scale, they have their UI sized to a set size and thats it.

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You assume incorrectly.

The way it works on macOS is that you select the ‘looks like’ resolution to determine the size. For example if you have a 4k monitor you can set a ‘looks like’ resolution of 2560x1440. Internally it always renders at 2x, so in this case it will render to 5120x2880. That image is then scaled down to the actual display resolution, e.g. 3480x2160. It’s basically supersampling.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So they do the same as GNOME? Scale double and then scale down?

Okay that makes sense as you need more pixels to work with.