this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
25 points (96.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5289 readers
523 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
25
COP29 live: $300bn cash deal for poorer countries rescues UN climate talks from collapse (www.bbc.com)
submitted 10 hours ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What’s the bet $0 of that ends up doing anything related to climate change.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 5 points 9 hours ago

The global GDP is about $100Trillion. So $300billion is 0.3% per year. It is meant for climate finance and a massive sum, which makes it pretty certain that something ends up in something climate related. Especially with the US likely to leave, which leaves most payers being fossil fuel importers. So they have much less of a reason to promote fossil fuel development. Obviously though a lot of the money will end up in the hands of the rich, thanks to corruption in every country involved.