this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
374 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59517 readers
3096 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 4 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)

sell it to Microsoft so they can finally have a web browser that people use

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 minutes ago

Never again

[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 3 points 31 minutes ago (1 children)

Who would buy this and how would they monetize it? In browser ads? A freemium paid model to remove the ads?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 minutes ago

I'll bid $3.50 just to GPL it.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 43 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is the last antitrust win we'll get for years, isn't it?

I know Trump doesn't like Big Tech, but I doubt his admin will punish them meaningfully, but just rail about censorship.

[–] babybus@sh.itjust.works 35 points 4 hours ago

This isn't a win I think. They are yet to meet in the court with Google.

The DOJ will file a revised version of its proposals in early March, before the government and Google return to the DC District Court in April for a two-week remedies trial.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 53 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Ehh just fight it for a month pay king trump some money and bam their golden.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 27 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is exactly what will happen. Same thing with Albertsons and Kroger too.

[–] fern@lemmy.autism.place 12 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Okay but consider them taking this moment to let Elon buy it and using it to control information on the clients end 💀

Maybe we'll actually see people switch to Firefox if that happens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 11 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Hot take: they sell Chrome but keep Chromium.

[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago (1 children)

How would that work exactly? Google would sell Chrome but keep paying teams if developers to work on Chromium?

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 1 points 6 minutes ago

Basically. I mean look at Edge, it’s running Chromium under the hood, but the UI is developed by Microsoft.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 hours ago

Seeing how tech illiterate some of these people are, I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s what ends up happening

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

People wondering what Chrome has to do with a search monopoly:

The obvious benefit is that they can default the user's search provider to Google.

But the more nefarious benefit is that, by controlling both the client and server, they can unilaterally decide the future of web standards. They don't have to advocate for proposals, gain consensus, and limit themselves to well-supported standards the way other companies do. They can just do it, gain the first-mover advantage, and force others to follow suit.

If they don't like HTTP/2, they can invent their own protocol and implement it for their search servers and Chrome. Suddenly, using Chrome with Google Search is way faster than using Chrome with Bing or using Firefox with Google Search. Even if Microsoft and Mozilla don't like the protocol, they now have to adopt it or fall behind.

This has happened. QUIC was deployed in 2012. Firefox gained support in 2021.

They're doing the same thing with Privacy Sandbox, and you can also look at browser feature compatibility tables to see how eager Google is to force their own interpretation of every not-yet-finalized web standard as the canonical interpretation.

Edit: Also, JPEG XL vs. WebP.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 33 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Just...please for the love of whatever dirty do Microsoft. Fucking sick of their shit recently with One Drive.

[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 5 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)

Do you have a few minutes to learn about our lord and savior Linux?

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago (1 children)

Man the Linux propaganda is STRONG on Lemmy. I'll say what I've said before: I use my computer for gaming, web browsing, and managing a media server for my family that hosts pictures and other things. If those 3 things can be done easily without issue on a Linux distro without having to fuck around with configs every time I want to do something, I'm all in. By what I've heard though it's just not there yet. I am super happy Steam decided to go Linux for their Steamdeck though as I've heard thats helped make monumental strides the right direction. Trust me, I want to. Large part of it is I worked tech support for over a decade and having to troubleshoot my own shit is like the furthest thing I want to deal with haha

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 2 minutes ago

You owe it to yourself to try it out! I recommend dual booting into Linux Mint Cinnamon for a while and have your windows install to fall back on to. That or one of the gaming-specific distributions, but from what I’ve seen Mint does all with gaming too. It’s a good all-around starting place, and there are a lot of resources because it’s popular and built off of the most popular distro. I installed it on my work machine (software engineering) and I’ve felt no lack of capability or a need to switch to a more “hardcore” distro.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 1 points 29 minutes ago

Microsoft is waaay easier to avoid than fucking google. Is one drive that annoying?

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There's literally so much else they should do, google docs, sheets, drive, phones, maps, earth, calendar, play store, translate, etc.
Good work, continue please.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What is the issue with docs, sheets, drive, phones, calendar, play store?

There seems to be plenty of options in all of these spaces. Play store isn't even on a lot of android devices.

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Correct. My example for another necessary intervention would be YouTube. That's a space in which Google does have a monopoly.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Exactly. There are workable alternatives to most of the others, but YouTube has a stranglehold on that type of content due to the network effect. Examples of alternatives:

  • docs/sheets/drive - Microsoft Office 365, OnlyOffice, or self-host LibreOffice Online (through Collabora CODE builds); if you just need drive, there's also BackBlaze, AWS, DropBox, etc
  • phones - I use GrapheneOS on their Pixel devices, but plenty of other Android phones support LineageOS/DivestOS/CalyxOS
  • calendar - still looking for a replacement for my smart watch, but I've been using my Nextcloud install; there are also some FOSS calendars that support CalDav as well, so look around
  • maps - I've been using Organic Maps, which has been great; main problem is searching for addresses, but if it's in there, the directions so far have worked fine; there's also Apple maps, Bing maps, and probably some others
  • translate - it's built in to Firefox, and it seems to work well enough in a pinch

But there's really not much for YouTube. I guess there's Odyssee, Rumble, and a few others, but they don't have anywhere near the content as YouTube, so they're not really practical alternatives. I actually sub to Nebula which is the closest to a replacement so far, but there's still a ton of content that doesn't have a direct replacement there.

[–] Brodysseus@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

Off topic, but how do you like graphene? I am thinking of making the switch on a pixel 7a, but I have a fear it'll be like having Linux on my phone where things randomly don't work and then I have the hobby where I make it work

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Most definitely. They need viable competition.

[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 132 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker, says the DOJ is pushing “a radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.”

I'm honestly curious how this would "harm Americans".

[–] superkret 1 points 10 minutes ago

The same ruling would ban Google from paying other browsers to make Google the default search engine.
This would kill Firefox and make Chromium the only browser engine that's left.

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 1 points 20 minutes ago

How does chrome make money? It uses ads from Google, chrome on it's own is not a business.

Say you buy chrome, you have to options

  1. Ads built into chrome itself (when you're in the settings menu, homepage, reading a PDF, playing the dino game)

  2. Force your own default search engine, or get a company like Google or Bing to pay you for the privilege of being a default search engine.

Neither of these options are better than the status quo

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer sounds like Donald Trump

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

I fear this is exactly who they're courting.

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 52 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That statement is technically true.

The billionaire owners are Americans.

[–] Beldarofremulak@lemmy.world 23 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Everyone really does need to have that at the forefront of their mind. When the C-suit, wall street, and politicians talk about "Americans" they aren't talking about us schlubs.

[–] Homescool@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

The corporations are people too!

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 60 points 9 hours ago

Google pretending they have any other nationality other then “the global internet” is cute in a disgusting way.

[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 54 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

If they're allowed to choose who they sell it to this won't change anything

[–] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 hours ago

Sell it to Mozilla so they can make it uninstall itself and install Firefox instead in the next update

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›