this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
40 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5267 readers
711 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
40
Massive Energy Needs of AI & Cryptocurrencies Lead Amazon, Google & Microsoft to Embrace Nuclear Power (www.democracynow.org)
submitted 4 hours ago by pete_link@lemmy.ml to c/climate@slrpnk.net
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

November 19, 2024

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Can they embrace the uranium directly?

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

And they are surely paying for the thousands of years of waste storage necessary?

[–] spicehoarder@lemm.ee 10 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

When a radioactive rock is stored in a cave somewhere instead of pumping the atmosphere full of CO2: 🤬🤬🤬

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 hours ago

When a radioactive roch is stored in a cave somewhere instead of stopping to produce crypto currencies: 🤬🤬🤬

[–] madejackson@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

At least co2 doesn't shoot at me when i get too close /joke

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be an obvious part of the price they will pay for the electricity? The electricity producer or whatever intermediate in charge of the waste, will bill its work for waste storage, and it will end up on the bill of the energy consumer. What am I missing?

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 1 points 1 hour ago

over half a century of fear mongering from the nuclear industry itself to upsell safety systems

[–] arsCynic@beehaw.org 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Crypto Cult Science
“Money corrupts; bitcoin corrupts absolutely. Disregarding all of bitcoin's shortcomings, a financial instrument that brings out the worst in people—greed—won't change the world for the better.” —https://www.arscyni.cc/file/crypto_cult_science.html