>New logo is soulless slop
Every single company
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
546 points (97.9% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
26915 readers
3787 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
My favorite shit logo redesign is
KИ
I can't believe anyone thought that was a good logo...
Makes it easier to forget them and not being able to keep them apart. That's really great for us. Less ads in our brains.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Better:
- Revolut (though a fintech company named after a revolution lacking the charge at the end is still moronic in several ways)
- airbnb (from awful to meh)
- Spotify (same)
Worse:
- Pinterest (original fit the platform and what it is/was pretty much perfectly. Current is meh)
- eBay (both are bad IMO, but at least the original was bad in a playful and eye-catching way. The new one is just more meh
- Burberry (the stag was notable and signalled a history of old-fashioned quality that's suitably rugged. The new one is meh AND insecure about people knowing which London they're from)
- Rimova (yet another fashion brand apparently afraid of being noticed
- DF (from one of the best and most fashion-appropriate logos to an absolute eyesore and kerning nightmare that invites vandalism)
- Jaguar (From absolutely iconic and great in every way to even uglier than the new DF one. I hope whomever came up with that got both fired and beaten and I'm a pacifist.)
The rest just go from meh to slightly different meh 🤷
I liked the old aibnb one.
Microsoft went from "boring with a bit of attitude" to just plain boring
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Those old fashion logos are actually sick. Concerning that an industry that sells style would make these their logos.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(14 replies)
"We're a tech company now!" logo
I would have failed every design class I took in college if I submitted that. Why such wide kerning? Why lower case but upper G? Why so round? Why so completely unreadable at a distance because of micro serifs? There isn't one good design element in this.
It doesn't say "car" at all either; no elegance or prestige. The old logo was sexy. New one looks like a logo for bottled water or something.
Edit: it's like going from James Bond to Austin Powers.
I think they want people to focus on the "agua" and the j and r are just little accents on it like its word art rather than a logo. Like, I literally picture the marketing weirdos at the meeting going off like this.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
I fucking hate this minimalist design trend more than it is probably reasonable to hate an aesthetic. It's got the personality of unfinished drywall.
Honestly I think unfinished drywall has more personality. It’s utilitarian and rough around the edges, without the shiny surface veneer.
That new Jaguar logo is like somebody took a beautiful old house full of exposed brick and wood work and put a coating of white paint over everything.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Top looks like it belongs on a nice sports car.
Bottom looks like you can find it on a new Multipla.
That font is awful. The G looks completely unrelated to any of the other letters.
The G looks completely unrelated to any of the other letters.
I see this, since half of the letters appear to be uppercase, and the other half lowercase:
JaGUar
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
/uj Technically this is their new logo:
J a G U a r is just their new typeface (I think that’s the name?); and apparently/allegedly is to make the pronunciation closer to UK English, rather than American.
Either way, though - it’s still..
/j
..pReTtY fArKiN’ sToOoPiD.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Soon there will be no color, no originality.
Just a single font to use everything will be homogeneous and consolidated. Minimal, inoffensive and focused grouped to appeal to everyone and also no one.
Movies, music, games, brands.
Jaguaren't
GUys I'm from ~~2040~~ 2035, here's Microsoft's logo
MS corporate comms army did a sik job getting across those inscrutable monolith vibes, I bet when it launched they all clapped (even though clapping is in performance reviews)
BONUS: heres Amazon, Faceberg and Nvideo too (yay diversity)
spoiler
load more comments
(2 replies)
JaGUar
The font is ugly.
Wow, they really took their logo from sexy, fast and expensive looking, to looking like an over priced soft drink?
That's impressive, haha.
It looks like an off brand sportswear shirt you'd find on an African market.
A design consultant probably sent Jaguar a six-figure bill for this new logo, you know.
They went from luxury car company to mediocre smartphone brand
Somewhere in Jaguar HQ, a marketing firm convinced the CxO suite that the most pressing problem facing the company was that the logo was wrong. So, in the interests of the shareholders they write off the goodwill value of the existing brand and dump millions of euro into this.
load more comments
(12 replies)
That looks like marketing, let their six-year-old design the logo. Half the letters or lowercase and half are uppercase.
It takes a heroic amount of cocaine to make something so devoid of taste and see it through.
I love how the new logo could be literally done in less than a minute on fucking microsoft office. They didn't even bother with a cool looking font, just generic curvy shit
load more comments
(2 replies)
Their logo doesn't have a jaguar and their car commercial doesn't have any cars. Fuck it, whatever
Awh hell nah, no more JAAAAAAAAAAG :(
I hate these new logos these corporations make, the old jaguar logo looked like power the new one looks like some weird startup.
They're trying to impress investors with 'serious' design, not stand out with a unique one
Nothing says "serious" like mixing upper and lower case letters yet keeping them all the same height, so it looks like a third grader wrote it
load more comments
(1 replies)
oversimplifying logoes and stuff makes me rage, especially this
view more: next ›