this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024

314 points (97.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21355 readers

1646 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

2. Be civil

Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.

Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.

Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.

Bigotry will not be tolerated.

These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.

3. Post Linux-related content

Including Unix and BSD.

Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.

No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.

4. No recent reposts

Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

poopsmith@lemmy.world

zephyr@lemmy.world

rtxn@lemmy.world

314

Snap... (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 week ago by rootww@sh.itjust.works to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Wanderer@r.nf 4 points 4 days ago

Just use Ente instead.

[–] exception4289@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Or just use Keysmith and import your keys there.

[–] udon@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Once you discover you can just install the nix package manager with one command and then install everything with another, snap is out of the game. Even if you just use nix for like 2 packages, it's already much better

[+] rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com 78 points 1 week ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

[deleted]

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've had bad experiences with AppImages. For universal format they do a really poor job at that. And it's a huge step back into Windows direction that you'll have to manually download, update etc your shit. Makes managing a bunch of apps a pain.

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

The thing with appimages is that they expect the developer to have full knowledge of what libraries need to be bundled with their app, which makes it difficult to make truly universal appimages. In flatpak you just select one of a set list of runtimes and add any additional dependencies on top of it. Flatpak also re-uses the files for each runtime in between the different apps that use it, which saves a lot of disk space.

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But isn't appimage the closest one to the app-system from Android? Since things could be really different on many clients an "app-container" is the best solution.

Why not containerise everything? You need libreoffice? No problem, here is a docker or podman container.

BTW. I like flatpak, too. It's the most stable, but I never understand it's mechanics. There is always another pack installed, freecode, gtk, qt whatever. Even if the system has already the correct gtk version, nope, the dev decided to use the gtk image from Ubuntu.

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why not containerise everything? You need libreoffice? No problem, here is a docker or podman container.

Flatpak is basically GUI-optimized containers. It uses the same technology (namespaces) as docker and podman, just with some extra tools to make GUI-related things work properly. That's why flatpak apps don't use the system's gtk version -- they're running in a sandbox with a different rootfs. You can spawn a shell into the sandbox of a specific app with flatpak run --command=sh com.yourapp.YourApp and poke around it if you want to.

[–] unrushed233@lemmings.world 3 points 6 days ago

It uses bubblewrap for sandboxing under the hood, right?

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thx, looks like that's the info I've missed.

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

If you're interested in another approach to containerizing GUI applications, also checkout out x11docker. It's a small independent project maintained by one guy, nothing big like flatpak, but also pretty cool. The name is actually a bit limiting -- it supports both docker and podman, and can run wayland apps as well. One of the coolest features, in my opinion, is the ability to run a separate X server inside every sandbox and forward individual windows to the "host" X server. That way you can prevent apps from spying on your keyboard or other apps' windows.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

I'm not too familiar with whatever Android is doing with apks these days tbh. I just don't like how AppImages fails at the one thing it should do (universality) and doesn't have the repo model built in. You can have third party solutions to that but it's just not the same experience.

Why not containerise everything? You need libreoffice? No problem, here is a docker or podman container.

I've heard people suggest such a solution. Everything is a container and stuff is just exported out so that it shows up to the system like a normal program. Can't really say I'm the right person to judge the pros and cons.

There is always another pack installed, freecode, gtk, qt whatever. Even if the system has already the correct gtk version, nope, the dev decided to use the gtk image from Ubuntu.

It can be both good and bad and sometimes it's necessary. The whole system relies on being able to use different versions of libraries. But having them as separate packs can help in that programs can share those packs so as a dev you can just target one common base and have your stuff work everywhere. And sharing those runtimes has the benefit of someone else keeping it up to date while you can just test if the updated version works for you and switch to that if it does and so on. And with deduplication, runtimes and stuff share the parts that are common to both afaik.

It's a bit more complicated than just shoving everything in but also it's less work than same thing having to be packaged separately for every distro.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

Auto-updates are a hell-no for me.

There was a perfectly good user interface for updates. Then Ubuntu decides "wait.. What if we made updates compulsory and effectively random and skipped the UI. The user can do system updates whenever they want, because those don't matter for security or something, but these apps must be updated whenever snap determines they must."

Oh, snap!

[–] LMagicalus@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I used to use flatpak for everything, but I just dont have the hard drive space to store duplicates of my graphics drivers.

[–] TheGingerNut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh come on, mesa is only (checks) 112 megabytes!

you know what, carry on!

[–] LMagicalus@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Last I recall, my drivers for Flatpak took up an extra 20 gigs of my 256 gig hard drive.

[–] TheGingerNut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

at 112 megabytes per instance that amounts to about 178 flatpaks. Which sounds pretty standard

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Fun fact: there used to be an Authy flatpak that just installed the snap inside

[–] renzev@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh, what the fuck!?

TBH I wouldn't mind it that much. The whole point of flatpak is that the developer can do whatever demented satanic rituals they want inside of the sandbox, and it won't contaminate the rest of the system.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 4 points 6 days ago

Flatpak has long had the ability to dump the contents of a snap into it, because snaps had already solved many of the build issues flatpaks were struggling with and they used similar runtimes for their sandboxing. It's also a convenient way to convert apps over, since many apps got packaged as snaps before flatpak was really usable.

[–] wax@feddit.nu 31 points 1 week ago

Yo dawg, I herd you like containers so I put snap in yo flatpak, so that u can sandbox in your sandbox

[–] unrushed233@lemmings.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ente Auth > Authy

[–] rbits@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah, I mean the snap app shown above is being deprecated so there's not even a choice. If you're using Authy on PC you have to switch.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Yep. I'm selfhosting it now. Works great but selfhosting isn't straightforward yet, still the best Authy/Google/Microsoft Authenticator drop in replacement with sync.

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] powermaker450@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

2FAuth. On the web so you can check it anywhere you want and supports passkeys.

[–] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

How about https://2fas.com/?

load more comments