this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
137 points (94.8% liked)

News

23655 readers
2406 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Darorad@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

studied evil

more like was evil

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Did he do anything besides the Stanford Prison Experiment that I just don't know of? Because if that's all, I'd be more inclined to say that he's just stubbornly wrong rather than evil. But maybe you know something I don't

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Well the experiment followed zero ethical guidelines, so in a way a type of evil

[–] Famko@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Vsauce's "Mindbreak" series on YouTube did an episode on the Stanford Prison experiment and Zimbardo's later work in life if you want to check it out.

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

What a fucking fraud

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Just FYI, this is an old article. He died on October 24th.

Also, he was instrumental in exposing torture in Iraq, no matter what his earlier unethical experiment did.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Zimbardo#Testimony_at_Trial_of_Abu_Ghraib_Prison_Guards

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The only thing useful about that study was his vile behavior and how everyone at the university went along with it.

Hell, he was still working at a University in Palo Alto just a few years ago.

Even after admitting all the horrible shit he did, he kept teaching (and probably kept banging his students like he did back then) until only a few years ago.

He might not have stopped at all.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Nope, there was something else useful. That he specifically did because of it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Zimbardo#Testimony_at_Trial_of_Abu_Ghraib_Prison_Guards

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I remember some popular YouTuber ran an experiment trying to re-create the conclusions that Zimbardo had come to. The results contradicted his conclusions and they confronted him. He continued to defend his experiment. He seemed like a rather stubborn man.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Humm, so we have two similar experiments with different outcomes?

That just seem to indicate that we don't have enough data.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't think anyone has been able to recreate his experiment. He's accused of manipulating it to fit his narrative. He denies these accusations, of course.

[–] Contentedness@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 month ago
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Zimbardo is part of a generation of psychology that struggled with why modern European people did a Shoah. Or rather a generation that sought to confirm through experiment that the Germans were alright and it was really all Hitler's fault. Or at least a small number of evil Germans who caused the whole mess.

It's auspicious to bring this up now because just watching the news these days makes a fool of Zimbardo.