this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
427 points (98.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26877 readers
2324 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cron 119 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

If it's a civil and interesting discussion, why not?

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 85 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Exactly. If two people are making competing compelling arguments, they've both earned an upvote. Using Up/Down votes as a means to siding with someone is a good way to build an echo chamber.

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Up/down votes should be used more as “I think this comment has a positive/negative contribution to the conversation”.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It should, but it absolutely isn't.

[–] Deebster@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

You're right, and even the Lemmy devs get this wrong in the docs:

You can upvote posts that you like so that more users will see them, or downvote posts so that they are less likely to be seen.

Note that it doesn't talk about the quality or appropriateness of the comment, just that you can suppress it by downvoting.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Playing devil's advocate, I completely disagree. If two people are making competing arguments, only the one being needlessly contrarian deserves an upvote. Using Up/Down votes as a means to side with someone is a good way to build a Boeing 747-200 engine.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

You sure you don’t mean a 737-MAX? They don’t make the 747 anymore, AFAIK, or is that just the passenger model that ended?

[–] VitabytesDev@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

No I don't think so (upvote).

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When I agree with a comment, but the rebuttal is civil, well thought out, and reasonable, I’ll upvote both. I’m more likely to downvote attitudes I don’t like rather than statements.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

Typically I value comments based on argumentative strength and/or whether information provided adds value to discussion.

Strong arguments will be upvoted even if I disagree with the overall conclusion. And part of what makes arguments strong is civility and open-mindedness (in my opinion).

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is actually the way you are supposed to do it.

[–] nomous@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Yep, if it contributes to the discussion (even if you don't agree) you up vote. If it contributes nothing or derails the discussion, down vote.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sometimes a point is well made even if I disagree with it, the conclusion in it or disagree with the path it suggests whilst agreeing with the objectives.

It's like how in Politics in better times (or less adversarial countries) one might respect a political oponent whilst disagreeing with them.

There's also a trait in some cultures were people tend to try and poke holes on other people's ideas and point out the bits they find incorrect, not because they're against it, in disagreement with it or to put down that other person, but to try and help improve that idea even further - in other words, genuine constructive criticism. A downvote isn't constructive, and sometimes people deserve an upvote for trying or for how far they got, even if the end result could be better.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Upvoted both of you

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

One can appreciate a strong argument, even if it goes against what they themselves believe.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Upvotes are supposed to represent that a comment added to the conversation in some way. Just because two individuals disagree doesn't mean that they didn't contribute.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

For me:

Upvote = worth your time to read

Downvote = not worth your time

[–] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago

Many discussion topics can be complex and are much more than one side or the other, so I've found doing this in the sense of replying that I agree on these parts, however...

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I almost never even downvote because it's an active choice to push down someone's opinion.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

Since I blocked Lemmy.ml, I haven't downvoted anything at all for several weeks, which is surprising especially given the USA election. Lemmy's userbase really is 1000-fold more enjoyable to interact with than e.g. Reddit.

Overall I only downvote someone acting as a troll, and often even then just ignore it and move on.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

I upvote everyone I interact with ... positive, negative, agreeable, disagreeable, questionable, correct, incorrect, dumb, intelligent ... the only time I downvote is if someone is genuinely advocating violence or death or murder against anyone

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

"Why should I break my head about the outside world? Let the outside world break it's own head!"

"He's right. As the good book says, if you spit in the air, it lands in your face."

"Nonsense! You can't close your eyes to what's happening in the world."

"...He's right."

"He's right, and he's right, they can't both be right."

"You know, you are also right."