this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
602 points (98.5% liked)

Chronic Illness

244 readers
16 users here now

A community/support group for chronically ill people. While anyone is welcome, our number one priority is keeping this a safe space for chronically ill people.

This is a support group, not a place for people to spout their opinions on disability.

Rules

  1. Be excellent to each other

  2. Absolutely no ableism. This includes harmful stereotypes: lazy/freeloaders etc

  3. No quackery. Does an up-to date major review in a big journal or a major government guideline come to the conclusion you’re claiming is fact? No? Then don’t claim it’s fact. This applies to potential treatments and disease mechanisms.

  4. No denialism or minimisation This applies challenges faced by chronically ill people.

  5. No psychosomatising psychosomatisation is a tool used by insurance companies and governments to blame physical illnesses on mental problems, and thereby saving money by not paying benefits. There is no concrete proof psychosomatic or functional disease exists with the vast majority of historical diagnoses turning out to be biomedical illnesses medicine has not discovered yet. Psychosomatics is rooted in misogyny, and consisted up until very recently of blaming women’s health complaints on “hysteria”.

Did your post/comment get removed? Before arguing with moderators consider that the goal of this community is to provide a safe space for people suffering from chronic illness. Moderation may be heavy handed at times. If you don’t like that, find or create another community that prioritises something else.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Comrade_Spood@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (37 children)

Nah, I'll do you one better. Abolish money, an economy based on mutual aid.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not gonna happen until we have Star Trek tech like matter replicators, and have killed all the bastards who first got their hands on them and try to keep them secret to exploit them for 0 cost high profit.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Not gonna happen until we have Star Trek tech like matter replicators, and have killed all the bastards who first got their hands on them and try to keep them secret to exploit them for 0 cost high profit.

This would happen very quickly as soon as someone figures out how to bypass security on them (you just know they'll require some sort of janky app) and remotely orders a cocktail of bleach and ammonia.

[–] Comrade_Spood@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

We have the means to meet everyone's needs rn. We don't need some scifi replicator. The only things holding us back is the exploiting class, and people who think a middle man like money is needed. You are holding yourself back. Money is simply a middle-man to the distribution of goods. Through communal ownership of capital and what it produces, you do not need money as people can just take what they need. And people will work and produce because 1. What happens when people don't do the work? It doesnt get done and you don't get the goods, so if you want the goods you better ensure its made. If people refuse to do the work then I guess the good isn't worth making to begin with. And 2. People desire purpose and to be a part of communities, part of that is work. It just might not be the work they are doing currently.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And that is totally going to end up with how it is now.

A subclass of unwanted, uncared about workers that no one gives a single shit about until the tomato is unavilable/too expensive/etc.

Which is not meeting everyones needs.

Its meeting you and yours needs.

[–] Comrade_Spood@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Genuinely how? If everyone owns things communally without the use of money as a middleman, how does that result in what we have now?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›