this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
94 points (97.0% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

169 readers
657 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

Politics

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Non-American here, heard about Project 2025 a few weeks ago.

For people unaware:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025#Policies

What is the likelihood of those policies to happen?

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

There is a small chance the bit T's ego leads him away from being told what to do, and following plans.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Maybe, but look at Agenda 47, that's Trumps actual plan

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

This is my hope. We get a half assed version of it implemented cause Trumps ego gets in the way. If trump dies and Vance takes over. Lol. We are fucked.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

He'll do what Putin tells him to.

[–] benjhm@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 hours ago

So far, he did - but just hoping maybe whatever blackmail P has on T won't work any more ... as he's got the votes (for the last time), also it seems mud just doesn't stick as more was revealed about his past deals with women and other dodgy business. They both follow the recipe book from 1930s germany, but that doesn't lead to peace.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

First order of business is an executive order that replaces thousands of federal employees with sycophants. With the house, the Senate, and supreme Court all red, trump is America now.

It's a foregone conclusion.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, it's all red. But are you sure they can all agree on which shade of red they are? Because I still think it's possible that there will be infighting.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

One thing GOP does well is get the rank in file in line. Dems could use a lesson in that.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Our only hope is Trump dies before inauguration. These things tend to fall apart once the figurehead dies.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So... Vance? Dude is worse than Trump

[–] shani66@ani.social 1 points 16 minutes ago

Trump's death would shatter the movement broadly, but there is an entire chain to go through before the immanent danger is actually dealt with.

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] hoch@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In other words, we're fucked.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I think there's still time for both Tr•mp and V•nce to be assassinated, not that the next few in line would probably be any better, knowing America's luck.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

At least we would have new elections tho

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 86 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The last time they were in charge they didn’t have any plans and couldn’t come up with any.

Now they have a playbook to follow.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 20 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

This is false. The Heritage Foundation released a Mandate for Leadership for 2016 and Trump implemented 64% of it in his first year - see https://www.heritage.org/impact/trump-administration-embraces-heritage-foundation-policy-recommendations

I suspect this is why the 2025-equivalent reaches much further - they know they have a guy who will push their shit through, and it's going to happen like a fucking trainwreck.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Wow. I thought he didn't change anything much last time.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world -4 points 16 hours ago

Then you're stupid.

[–] kernelle@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Yeah that's the actual scary part, last time he didn't know the extent of how far they could go. Now after 4 years of preparation...

I wish y'all the best of luck, the world knows you need it

[–] Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago

Maybe they’ll misinterpret it like their other book.

[–] uxia@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

there were some plans.. remember the wall? and how that never happened? i'm trying so desperately to hold onto the hope all this will go the same way

[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I honestly think this will be the last time we have an election. It's looking like he could possibly take the house, Senate is already red. Likely control of all 3 chambers. Our systems of checks and balances likely won't survive the next 2 years.

The man has outright said he would be a dictator on day one and would make his enemies pay.

1776-2024. RIP America's experiment in democracy.

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

I think youre being a little dramatic. Itll last till at least 2025

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Time for people to learn to fight the system outside of elections. Strikes, protests, mutual aid, propaganda/education, and, last resort, guns.

[–] kozy138@lemm.ee 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't forget art! Arguable the most effective tool at our disposable to shift the way humanity thinks.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True! Especially since it's often really good at making you feel something.

[–] nomous@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

The art of throwing bricks and using angle grinders as skeleton keys.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee -3 points 17 hours ago

Lmdao.yeah. Tell Gazans to make some art too. I’m sure that’ll work out great for them…

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

With a trifecta? Pretty much 99% likely. Unless Trump just loses focus and doesn't actually do anything for the first two years and we can take that back from him in the midterms.

Things are only going to get more terrifying from here.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 5 points 15 hours ago

It's sad that the fact that the next president is a fucking moron is supposed to be the silver lining

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

They don't need Trump to stay focused. They just need him to sign his name. Vance and Teil will be running the show. Project 2025 is coming and yes they are about to gut the government under Christian law.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'd say it's 100% likely.

This is the guy who tried, and partially succeeded, to ban Muslims after all.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If they also get the House it is extremely likely that the whole thing will be implemented. The party supports it on paper even if they deny it when asked and the people behind it are the ones funding the party.

They will vote in lock step to pass it after getting rid of the filibuster, Trump will sign it, and SCOTUS will declare the unconstitutional parts to be constitutional when challenged.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The landslide means Republicans are favored to take the House again. So... pretty good, depending on whether Johnson and Thune can get all their little ducklings in a row.

Of course, Republicans have a long and storied history of getting into office and then immediately ratfvcking one another. So, we'll see what they actually get done versus what they bicker to death. Can the GOP even get a Speaker nominated properly this time?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Do we even know what would happen if there is no speaker by the time the Congress votes to ratify the EC votes on Jan 6? Can they do it later, or does that push it into a contingent election?

What if the GOP can't get the House in order by Jan 20? Can the Senate still vote for a contingent VP if the House is dysfunctional? I'd laugh if Vance ends up President because the GOP House is full of children.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Depends on the part of the project. Some of it absolutely will. Some of it definitely won't.

Many things would require Congress to approve, and it's unlikely those that have to face reelection would just go for it.

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

It's looking like the Republicans will control the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. They are going to jam anything they want through in the next two years and use the stacked supreme court to keep it in place for the next 30.

The checks and balances are gone.

[–] yrmp@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh you sweet summer child. Republicans have been talking about martial law since at least 2008. It’s all been projection for this very moment. There likely won’t be an election in 2026, 2028, or 2030, if ever again.

Also they have congress. They’re going to have a full “mandate”.

[–] nzeayn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

it'll depend entierly on their ability to implement, i mean they'll try but they only seem good at tax cuts. remember infrastructure week? and (hopefully) less people are willing to fall for the adult in the room enablement. if they go after the right to unionize right out of the gate, we need to wake the fuck up right away to the reality that theres no reasoning with them, or we're fucked. i mean we're probably still fucked, and a lot of people are going to get hurt. but we might make it to having midterms with union engagement. im not ready for molitivcocktial hour while theres a chance to put organized labor at the center of democtrats powerbase again.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
[–] BonerMan@ani.social -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They will try. And they will fail no person with a mind wants that shit and there will be problematic events when they try to hard.

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

no person with a mind wants that shit

Well I guess 51% of the mindless population just voted for it. There will be zero problematic events when he controls the house, the senate and the courts. He has 2 clear years of "fuck it, I'll do what I want" and it's too late to do anything about it.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With everything that Trump has said and done, you think this is where Trump voters will draw the line? You are delusional

[–] BonerMan@ani.social -2 points 1 day ago

No I think the other people also have guns...