NonCredibleDefense

3522 readers

3 users here now

Rules:

Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
No spam or soliciting for money.
No racism or other bigotry allowed.
Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

!forgottenweapons@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

PugJesus@lemmy.world

601

Considering last night's results, I don't expect NATO to be credible 4 years from now (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works to c/noncredibledefense@lemmy.world

265 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 6) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wait ... NATO was credible now?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

good?

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (5 children)

Trump's point about NATO countries needing to adhere to the funding that was agreed with mutually is a good one and I'm super confused why he was ridiculed about it when he said it. I mean, what's the point of the alliance if we don't do the things we agree to do?

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments