this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
1526 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59599 readers
3386 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 330 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 120 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 104 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (15 children)

Yeah, so the thing is, any amount of trust that I had has already been completely destroyed. "We don't do it anymore because it's illegal, trust me bro" isn't going to cut it. Does the bill include mandatory prison time for executives for violations, or just cost-of-doing-business fines? Will this be enforced by a government regulatory body that is not literally outnumbered 20:1 by car manufacturer lawyers?

If the car has any kind of network capabilities and 100% of the car's software is not open source, I'm not buying it. Period.

This bill would not need to exist if cars were FOSS, or if cars were non-networked. Those are the only 2 solutions that I will accept. This bill is worthless to me.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Will the regulatory body be stacked with, and bribed by auto execs?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

something, something, open source car.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some nerd running Gentoo on his car. Has to recompile everything every time he has an oil change.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FrankFrankson@lemmy.world 208 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Touchscreens were never popular with customers. Manufacturers kept cramming touchscreens in cars and using them to control everything becuase they were being stupid with new tech.

Edit: I guess I should have been clearer. I was talking about as a replacement for tactile controlls in a car like the article is talking about. Reverse cameras and other things that are good to have a touch screen for make perfect sense but using your touch screen to control your Air conditioning in a way that you have to divert your attention from the road to operate sliders and buttons on a touch screen is dumb as hell.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 108 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Also the fact that touch screens are cheaper to build with how expensive battery tech has been in electric cars.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cheaper to build and can be adjusted and patched as you go

[–] rizo@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

One of the biggest problems with touch is still that you have to take your eyes off the road (for quite some time). I have no issue if we are talking about some internal media center stuff and you still have some sort of haptic button on a steering wheel. But as soon as we are talking about AC, fans and everything you sometimes need to drive, I'm off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anivia 42 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Touchscreens are great to have, controlling Android Auto or Apple Carplay with physical buttons like you have to do in a Mazda is a nightmare.

The problem is when the touchscreen is used as a replacement for physical controls, instead of an addition. Stuff like controlling your climate control should not be exclusively controlled through the touchscreen

And don't even get me started about VWs stupid decision to put touch controls on the steering wheel. At least they backpedaled on that decision pretty quickly

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 36 points 2 weeks ago

I love my touchscreen, it’s great for media control, map, etc.

Mind you that is all it does, every other feature is behind a physical button. Which I also love.

Touchscreen for some things, physical for the rest.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] franklin@lemmy.world 145 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

Can we address headlights that are brighter than the sun now?

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 97 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

my issue isn't really with the brightness, it's the height. Don't get me wrong bright headlights are annoying as fuck, but a huge ass truck behind me with their headlights literally higher than my back window is insane.

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

My point exactly. The brightness is great, when it works in your favor. But when a modern car sits at such a height, where the low-beams shine directly over the top of my car, it's obnoxious

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] MonkeyBusiness@sh.itjust.works 119 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

They are more safe since people can feel the buttons without taking their eyes off of the road. I don't understand why they thought it was a good idea to use touchscreens.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (8 children)

That's true.

With a T9 phone, I used to be able to send a complete text message without ever taking my eyes off the road.

Now that I've got a touchscreen I'm swerving all over the place every time I try to text. It's way less safe.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 93 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Also, bring back gauges, instead of idiot-lights. It's nice to know when a problem is beginning (overheating, etc) before it becomes a crisis when you have no choice but to pull over.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Yeah I hate it when information is hidden in the name of minimalism. I'd rather have a plane cockpit UI than a bicycle UI, even if it means I feel like an idiot at various points when I discover new things I could have been doing the whole time.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 78 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I'm so glad I kept my car and weathered through this shitty phase of car manufacturing.

If only there was hope for weathering through the data collection, subscription-based features and the death of sedans though...

[–] pinkystew@reddthat.com 31 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

I asked a dealer for a dumb-car. No fucking auto 911 dialing, bluetooth enabled, GPS service horseshit, just a normal car and he shot me

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zerthax@reddthat.com 76 points 2 weeks ago

Yay, I never left having physical controls for things like HVAC controls and volume.

Touchscreens are great for context-sensitive controls, but less so for things that should be accessible at all times and usable without looking.

[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Touchscreens can stay, but only for non-essential tasks like changing settings or entering addresses. Climate, media, and all other controls you usually use while driving should be tactile by mandate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 51 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

But we've still got a good 10 years of avoiding used cars. This era is literally landfill.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 2 weeks ago

10 years and counting

There's so much bullshit in new cars that's it's infuriating, especially considering the cars call home with all kinds of privacy violating bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 49 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Yes please.

I don't know how much longer my button & dialled up 2012 shitbox is going to last. Being able to buy new without the crap is something to look forward to.

Then again, there's the whole 'car phones home/connected services' thing to consider as well. I like my car safe, but dumb as rocks otherwise.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] datendefekt@lemmy.ml 49 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (10 children)

Back in the 80s, Don Norman popularized the term affordance. Humans need something to push, pull, turn or otherwise interact with. We are physical beings in a physical world.

Driving vehicles is potentially life-endangering. Just because the technology is there and cheaper does not mean that humans can push aside their physiological limitations in a critical situation.

Take the emergency blinker. You know where it is, you see it all the time - it's right there in front of you! But when a real emergency happens, you'll be fumbling for the button, concentrating on the situation at hand. Now imagine that button on a touchscreen.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Unknown1234_5@lemmy.world 47 points 2 weeks ago

Should be illegal to have touchscreen controls in a car, it requires you to look at it to effectively control it, which means the car forces you to ignore the road to do anything.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Finally. Are they actually hiring decent UX folks this time or are they using the people who designed 1980s VCR programming UIs again?

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

You mean like the 1985 Subaru XT Coupe? God I love that cassette futurism look!

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 41 points 2 weeks ago

God I hope so

[–] Subtracty@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Plotnick, an associate professor of cinema and media studies at Indiana University in Bloomington, is the leading expert on buttons and how people interact with them.

I like that being a leading expert on buttons is a profession that exists in this world. You go Rachel Plotnick.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When I’m driving, it’s actually unsafe for my car to be operated in that way. It’s hard to generalize and say, buttons are always easy and good, and touchscreens are difficult and bad, or vice versa. Buttons tend to offer you a really limited range of possibilities in terms of what you can do. Maybe that simplicity of limiting our field of choices offers more safety in certain situations.

Or maybe being able to consistently and reliably operate the thing without taking your eyes off the road has something to do with it? Hmm... Yes, this is really hard to generalize.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 39 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Cool, now bring back single cab light trucks with full length beds.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I just want a coffee table book with pictures of these stupid executive's faces who approved the original all touchscreen versions that were becoming ubiquitous.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You could make money from that. Trace the execs, get nice shiny photos to the tech, write some good copy, and publish "The Encyclopaedia of garbage tech" so that people in the future can ridicule and possibly learn from their stupidity.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Babalugats@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Touch screens are shit tor buttons. They can be hacked. They can be unresponsive.

There's a load of other reasons, but either or both are enough to realise that a physical button is much safer. Perfect example of safety being lost in technology. Just because we can, doesn't mean we should.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No I wouldn't say touchscreens are out, I would say augmenting them with physical buttons is about to get popular.

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Fucking finally.

Now make cars look like cars again. Last 30 years has been a parade of Jellybeans and Electric Shavers.

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

What I care more about is making cars... cars. Visit a dealership in the US and it's 98% SUV/Truck and 2% sedans.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

THANK JESUS H. VISHNU.

About fucking time.

[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Thank god! Touch screens on the stuff in cars are a huge pain in the ass if you have hands as big as mine and the icons are all tiny

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

But on the other hand, people seem to have a hunger for physical buttons, both because you don’t always have to look at them—you can feel your way around for them when you don’t want to directly pay attention to them—but also because they offer a greater range of tactility and feedback.

If you look at gamers playing video games, they want to push a lot of buttons on those controls.

She talks a bit… weird?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago
[–] a9249@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

All cars should function like a cockpit- each function has its own independent metal toggle switch that goes 'KAK when switched. I will fight you on this. We need someone to make an interior that does this; sells well, and then the golden age of independent buttons shall return!

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›