this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
-21 points (4.3% liked)

OpenSourceGames

2562 readers
35 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pure walled-garden behavior from the Minetest devs.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mlfh@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The feature request includes the phrase "Behind the scenes there would need to be some cryptographic magic," because it's just yet another "I have a sweet idea for an app, bro, I just need you to do the coding for me" pitch.

The project has 766 contributors with pull requests being accepted all the time. That's not a walled garden.

[–] hankskyjames777@thebrainbin.org -5 points 2 weeks ago

What I meant by "walled garden" is about federation and not commits, like look at the Signal app federation situation, they rejeted it because it might be confused with cyptocurrency, which I did hate because of its volatility

[–] joeldebruijn@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

Alternative idea .... Someone uses OpenConext to provide a federation hub connecting minetest servers with identity providers. You can even call it LuantiID.

https://openconext.org/

[–] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

I don't see how this is such a big issue. Would feel weird to not be able to change username per server. Sometimes as my name for playing with friends or a pseudonyme if playing with strangers?