this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
23 points (96.0% liked)

Privacy

31742 readers
584 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There is the diceware method to make passwords random and strong to crack. But is it advisable to use this method to make random names for email addresses? That is the concern I have, when a person makes a random email address, they inevitably introduce things with which they can be identified, breaking the previously stated randomness, what ways are there to avoid this?

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] colournoun@beehaw.org 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

https://simplelogin.io/ (owned by Proton) is great for this. They have a feature to generate an email address by random word or even by uuid.

[–] Darorad@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are these emails you need to memorize? Diceware would work.

Otherwise I'd just use something like simplelogin and just have it automatically generate one. Then just save it in your password manager.

[–] manito_manopla@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

They are email addresses that I have to memorize, they are not temporary.

[–] sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

There is anonymity and pseudonymity.

Do you need your opsec to be resistant to state-level actors (oppressive regime, censorship, illegal activities)? Well then you need to make sure you don't introduce anything that will deanonomize you.

Are you trying to be resistant to mass data collection efforts used for profit? Being on the pseudonymity spectrum is a good step.

Dealing with the latter is like dealing with a bully. Make it not worth their time. They just want to put you in bucket X so they can estimate the most likely way to influence you for reason Y. Pseudonymity is about having multiple aliases that get put into different buckets so their privacy invasive efforts are less effective.

[–] ivotedfornader@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Great comment, friend. Thank you!

For me I use ddg email aliases with bitwarden. It's great and free. I tried others but ddg works great but doesn't have any of the bells and whistles.

[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago

Use an anonymous email proxy like (https://)addy.io . Create an email address for every site.

Hopefully, I haven't misunderstood your question.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

That is a good idea just so that you don't have to think about any potential privacy issues. Your email could be {firstword}{secondword}{4 numbers} and so long as the words and numbers are randomly generated, you can avoid accidentally including personal references or biases.

Your username does not need to be high-entropy, though. It will be semi-public. So it's not about strength against dictionary attack or similar, it is just about leaving the selection process up to a random process that isn't witnessed by a third party. You can write scripts that will generate these kinds of things using Python and the faker library.