this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
639 points (96.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26892 readers
1879 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 245 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 17 points 1 month ago

Goddamn cardies....

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 186 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What it feels like having a conversation with conservatives

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And liberals

(Just trying to be inclusive)

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (19 children)

Once again the anarchists are the only correct group

it's like the curse of Nostradamus

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

More like the curse of nostradumbass

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

lemmy user DESTROYS the philosophical tendency of anarchism with FACTS and LOGIC and EXTREMELY mediocre WORDPLAY

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 82 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This thread is basically what modern politics feels like

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago
[–] PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works 68 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Is there a way to see this as four? I’m assuming so but legitimately can’t see anything other than three. Is that the joke and I’m overthinking‽ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 211 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's a riff on an old meme.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 96 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

alternative interpretation: it's only possible to be neither right nor wrong on something when the object is physically impossible

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I am very pluralistic so I'm ok with many numbers, except one, the singular is where I draw the line!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

It's an impossible object optical illusion but edited to be possible

[–] Pinklink@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

The original is one of those MC Escher type things where all the lines are connected and it actually does have four “ends” on one side

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At least there are no centrists in here claiming it's 3.5

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Typical. Both sides think theirs is the only correct answer, and that the other side is just wrong.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But in this case, the other side is wrong!

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Do you even hear yourself? You sound just like them. /s

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nichtburningturtle 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 51 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I can’t see four. I’m sure it’s there, it just doesn’t appear to me.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Do you not see four? Your really missing out. I think some guys even started worshiping it. We even started selling a book about four. Once you see it, you can join out super cool club and four based economy.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

We should build a wall around four, and make three pay for for it

[–] Faresh@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago

I think the joke is that there's indeed unequivocally just three, and that one of them still says four despite that fact, contradicting the readers expectations who normally for this format expects the middle thing to be something that changes with perspective (eg. 6 vs 9)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

The one on the left is a MAGA, they're unable to listen to logic even if the answer is right in front of them.

[–] don@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I see the problem, the artist forgot the rest of the sentence:

“Four-sided objects, of which there are three.”

Boom. Done. EZPZ. Do better, artist.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rectangular prisms have 6 sides though.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 9 points 1 month ago

You discovered "political nuance"

[–] Tixanou@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

I see seven

Are my eyes fucked up

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know why there's even a debate over that. The answer is clearly "Yanny."

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

no, it's blue and gold

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 month ago

There are four lights!

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Instructions unclear, I got my dick caught in the number 8.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

There's 3 lights

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

I'll never lose another argument with this up my sleeve

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] paladin3494@feddit.dk 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I guess it’s all a matter of cultural conditioning but growing up in Scandinavia this kind of rhetoric was always associated with right-wingers and other liberals whereas “both sides” was more common for progressives and leftists. The most common I saw was the one-persons-terrorist-is-another-persons-freedom-fighter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›