this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
90 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

58937 readers
3427 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
90
Intel is a security risk for China, says influential industry group. (lite.cnn.com)
submitted 1 week ago by Dot to c/technology@lemmy.world
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

According to the translation I read, the security-related complaint in CSAC's post is mainly about Intel Management Engine. And you know what? They're right. It is a back door, and it is a security risk. Not a new or obscure one, though, and not just for China.

The risks imposed by Intel Management Engine and AMD's Platform Security Processor have been known for several CPU generations. Obviously, a lot of us are unhappy about this and would like a way to disable them.

https://support.system76.com/articles/intel-me/

https://hackaday.com/2020/06/16/disable-intels-backdoor-on-modern-hardware/

Instead, these components have been made more and more integrated with core system functionality, making the prospect of disabling them less and less practical. I fear it may take legislation to give us back control of the computers we supposedly own.

[–] tekato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it may take legislation to give us back control of the computers we supposedly own

The government is the reason why you have backdoors built into your computers and routers.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Government comprises many departments and organizations, which do many things. It's not a single blob of all good or all bad.

Also, not all back doors and CPU bugs are government-imposed.

[–] tekato@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Government comprises many departments and organizations, which do many things. It's not a single blob of all good or all bad.

I don’t remember saying the contrary. When one part of the government does something, it was still the government.

not all back doors and CPU bugs are government-imposed

Don’t remember saying every single backdoor is government-imposed. Fact is there’s at least one backdoor that is for the government, whether there’s 1 or 5 doesn’t really matter.

[–] LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Jump ship from x86 to something that isn't hostile to users.

RISC-V
OpenPOWER

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Well that happens to be what China is pushing for indeed.

[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People online were making fun at my old PC still running an FX 8350. That one was released before all this. Who’s laughing now? I’m only partially kidding lol.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm online, and I commend you for continuing to use your hardware for as long as it does the job, instead of adding to the world's energy, material, and e-waste problems. Well done.

[–] tekato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He is adding to the world’s energy given that an FX 8350 is slower than something like a Ryzen 5600 at twice the TDP.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Your hypothetical energy savings from new hardware is nothing but a wild guess since you don't know his actual usage, and meaningless anyway unless you subtract from it the energy use from manufacturing and distributing a new system, as well as that from disposing of the old one.

Also, you haven't addressed the other problems mentioned at all.

[–] tekato@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago

you don't know his actual usage

Why would I need to know his usage? Whatever it might be, a newer CPU can do the same amount of work as an old CPU for a fraction of the energy.

meaningless anyway unless you subtract from it the energy use from manufacturing and distributing a new system, as well as that from disposing of the old one.

You mean the CPU that was already manufactured years ago and won’t magically disappear due to you refusing to upgrade to it? Whether you use it or not the energy to create it was already spent.

you haven't addressed the other problems mentioned at all

And I didn’t mean to. I simply corrected you when you congratulated him for using less energy, which is not true.

[–] Dsklnsadog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Intel ME enters the chat

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

{hacked immediately}

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

With simple null password response.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Oh hey, we were just talking about you!"

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Good, I was starting to think it was only China spying on everyone :D

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago

Imperialism and alt-imperialism are basically the same thing on the same team.