this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Antiwork

8124 readers
3 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Love how this has gone from "researcher at x university" to "tip from a friend of mine" in less than 48 hours.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does anybody have a link to the research? I'm curious how widely this applies.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This BS is the same as facebook memes that say "Bill Gates and George Soros are collecting your posts to farm lizard-people babies and start the New World Order! Everyone write 'I DO NOT CONSENT TO HAVE MY POST TURNED INTO LIZARD FEED' after every comment you make!"

It doesn't really work because no company worth a dollar is going to rely strictly on AI screening. Speaking as a manager, I simply don't put people on my team that I haven't vetted carefully, nobody I know in the professional world would differ.

[–] ECB@feddit.de 0 points 2 months ago

I'm skeptical that this is at all true, but it's not about being granted the job, but rather getting past the initial HR filtering and actually getting the chance to talk to a human.