this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
25 points (61.1% liked)

Technology

58669 readers
3897 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No way in hell is this going to be ready in two years.

Although I do like the idea behind the vehicle.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I'm surprised at his numbers. He claims a bus costs something like $1/mile, while his car would be something like $0.20/mile. I'm guessing the main difference is the driver, so I wonder if something like the robovan (looks stupid IMO) would be able to replace buses in many cases. In my area, we have on-demand transit outside of bus service zones (a van will come pick you up), so it would be cool if this type of service could connect individual riders to transit hubs.

But yeah, it's not going to be ready in two years. Could be cool though if it is and is priced as he stated (big doubt).

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It would depend hugely on the bus, and the environment it's working in, but $1 per mile sounds low, unless that doesn't count labour.

Buses are actually quite expensive to operate, it's cost effective because that cost is split between so many passengers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 5 points 4 days ago

I can't wait for another billion dollar company invading our cities with dumbass murder boxes.

"thanks for the honkshack" - Dirty melon husk and the boys

https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/11/24218134/waymo-parking-lot-livestream-honking-4am-san-francisco

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Fully self driving too! Snerk.

[–] AliasAKA@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

So glad I have Tesla shorts lol

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 4 days ago (3 children)

At first, i was staunchly against this as i am onboard the Fuck Tesla and Musk train.
However, electric auto-taxis would be great in addition to mass transport.

Fuck Musk, btw

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Where I live, there is a bus driver shortage leading to cancelled buses and limited service. Cyber cab, van or bus that runs the route outside of peak hours to give 24/7 service and monitor routes would be a big help. And it's a fixed route so the system can be optimized for those.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

They would, but don’t expect it from Tesla. Other companies are making actual, real progress while Musk continues kicking the can down the road with bold promises and no timelines.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (7 children)

electric robotaxis can help reduce co2 emissions and decrease the total amount of cars. This is good.

[–] Lanusensei87@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Looks more like the number of cars will stay the same-ish, but now there won't be a taxi driver making a living of it.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wrong. The problem right now is low utilisation of cars. Most cars just sit around 90-95% of the day. A robotaxi would have much higher utilisation, therefore fewer cars are needed overall.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A robotaxi would have much higher utilisation

You could call this "hope".

Or "wet dream".

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Are you familiar with the concept of a taxi? Do you really think a taxi does not make more trips per day than a privately owned car?

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think that this depends heavily on the success of that enterprise.

I am pretty sure that they start (when / if they start) with a very high number of vehicles in a city.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago
[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I also hope this can be a solution for people who need a car to live while reducing the number of individual cars, but I'm afraid Tesla is not really interested in reducing the number of cars.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Robotaxis are NOT going to reduce the number of cars that are filling up the streets and parking spaces.

They are replacing some of the traditional traffic while they carry passengers, and then they add more traffic when going home (or searching for a parking lot, or doing idle circles) after the ride, and when coming for the next passenger.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

When I say people who need a car, I mean people outside of cities where it is not reasonable to have public transportation. In this case, having a system of automatic electric cars that can be used by different people for their daily commute could reduce the number of cars outside of cities if the service is good enough.
Inside cities, public transportation is the solution.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›