this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
506 points (98.5% liked)

hmmm

4706 readers
421 users here now

Internet as an art

Rule 1: All post titles except for meta posts should be just plain "hmmm" and nothing else, no emotes, no capitalisation, no extending it to "hmmmm" etc.

I will introduce more rules later and when I finish doing that I will make an announcement post about that.

For overall temporary guide check out the rules here: https://www.reddit.com/r/hmmm/wiki/rules/

I won't be moving all of them here but I will keep most of them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I don’t know if this stupid or genius. Now I’m curious.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They missed the 25-foot waterproof wall, for the actual damage, the storm surge...

[–] UnmetPlayer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Just put down some moisture absorbers, it'll be fine.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Just stick it in some rice. Good as new.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

ok so. This isn't going to stop a tree, or a large rock from flying through the side of you wall, but if you home isn't mounted to the foundation (common in old homes) or very well mounted, or just not very wind load capable, this could actually be beneficial.

You could still experience "wall buckling" but since the roof is relatively secured, you're acting from a separate point of leverage. Which is essentially going to be in the middle of the wall, rather than at the top of the wall.

This is all assuming that these anchor points are as strong or stronger than the straps and mounting hardware. And the fact that your home doesn't disintegrate between the staps.

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 8 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Anyone claiming this is going to work has no idea how houses are constructed or how hurricanes cause damage.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (7 children)

This is actually not a bad idea

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Sarothazrom@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Checkmate, nature.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Maybe build with ICF ( insulated concrete forms).

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

A bit like the building at the top of Mount Washington

[–] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

I love this.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I wonder how deep those stakes are driven lol

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

+10 for holding the roof on the house

+5 for holding the house on the foundation

-7 for creating a large strong web effectively doubling the surface area where flying things can destroy your house.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Someone misunderstood building code for hurricane ties.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have that people post those and I don't doubt they are real anymore.

Now I'm just curious about what shape those anchors have, due to morbid curiosity.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

They’re 8 foot deep concrete anchors according to the interview

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're just round and deep. Also, it really does work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] konalt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

moving house

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

ive always wondered why nobody does that with their mobile homes. seems like enough strapping would help minimize tornado damage if they were anchored deep enough

[–] DerArzt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You've gotta remember that most mobile home communities are folks who own their units renting the land for use. This guy has custom concrete anchors, which a mobile home community property owner probably wouldn't want.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›