this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
336 points (94.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9481 readers
1459 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

America is too big for planes, too. If your transportation solution is flying, now everyone has to get around via endless highways or big, complicated regional airports, and you can only have so many of those. There's a reason why rural areas in North America have completely different politics from urban areas, and why so much of it is driven by a sense of isolation and abandonment. Trains promise to help here because they are able to stop in small places that will never, ever have practical airports.

A good rail network provides a reliable, consistent, repeatable, and straightforward three hour connection from Nowheresberg to the nearest city. Slow, but good enough to feel like they exist in the same planet. Unfortunately, that promise is subtle, and it plays out over decades, so the reward system we've created for ourselves is incapable of supporting it. And thus, we have Amtrak and confederate flags

https://cosocial.ca/@dylanmccall/113233671160717813

(page 2) 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A good rail network also connects to major airports to give people a range of choices so they can pick the best combination for their travel

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Do Australia, Canada or India have the same problem?

load more comments (5 replies)

I could provide a pseudo valid arguement for aircraft in the future to these remote locations. But i would rather waste time and comment space providing this pointless comment that doesnt contribute to anything.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I see the argument that OP is quoting but I'm left wondering one thing: if most folks in the countryside could travel to a "big" city in three hours, what business would they conduct? Outside of tourism, that is.

My understanding is this would be most useful to middle-men and business people, but the common man wouldn't have much use for it.

Edit: or is the (implied) application bigger than passenger rail?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›