this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
167 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59554 readers
3413 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mrnottoobright@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like even if they had “opted-out” it wouldn’t really matter because the AI would just learn their competitors course and teach it later. This is a strategy that works only when they all collectively opt-out or they don’t. Shady practice from Udemy for sure

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago

there is no way they can use the AI to teach anything yet. AI lies like 30% of the time. idk what they will use it for; maybe for search, maybe to polish up presentation, but if they try and use it as a teacher it will fail spectacularly.

[–] vapourisation@programming.dev 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thank you for the reminder to delete my Udemy account!

Gen-AI has 0 place being used in a learning setting, especially one people are explicitly paying for themselves. Sure, let's all learn from the Bullshit Machine.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I see potential in a chat bot that can explain concepts and answer questions, supported by illustrations.

[–] finestnothing@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I could see the potential if they were actually correct more often than not, but LLM models are like a politician - they hallucinate and say things that are wrong or just outright lies, but do it confidently enough to make people believe them

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah I agree.

[–] subignition@piefed.social 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if they really cared about intellectual property rights, this would be OPT-IN.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

they care about having the rights to their content, and about their rights to the content you produce.

[–] neblem@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Well that's a bummer but not surprising.

I wonder what a federated education marketplace could look like.

Some sort of (possibly locked) video hosting, maybe even Peertube, course discovery more like bookwyrm with lemmy style discussion forums? It'd be cool to have testing/assignment material like Blackboard built in too.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 month ago

I switched to in-person teaching a couple years ago and am glad I did. It's been a challenging time as an instructor finding ways to make sure I'm added value.

[–] AaronMaria@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago
[–] francisco_1844@discuss.online 3 points 1 month ago

I can't even think of any valid reason why Udemy would need GenAI. Closed my account. This is the type of behavior I will not accept from a company. If enough people stood up to the Reddit's and Udemy's of the world they may, ... maybe, be more responsible towards their users and their partners (in this case the people posting courses in Udemy).