this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
1 points (60.0% liked)

Comic Strips

11981 readers
2085 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nikita@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Thats why I don’t do that shit to people.

Who am I to question someone’s spirituality if it makes them happpy and they practice in a healthy way and it doesn’t negatively affect the people around them?

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

simpsons is going for so long i think they might have done literally every joke in existence by now

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wish atheists would see the light and become agnostic.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We’re all agnostic. No one truly “knows” one way or another. I personally think there isn’t a god because they don’t “need” to exist. There is no purpose, the universe just is and given a large enough system, life can be explained by randomness and chaos.

I don’t need the comfort of a god to justify my existence. I’m ok with just existing here and now and when I’m gone I hope I made enough difference in those still living to carry on in spirit.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is atheist deletion. I know God doesn't exist that same way I know unicorns don't exist. Or the same way I know Gandalf wasn't real. I am not an agnostic, I am quite sure that there is not a spooky sky wizard who refuses to demonstrate its existence.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

To me it comes down to a scientific approach.

The hypotheses that Gandalf is a fictional creation has enough evidence to it that I believe it has risen to the level of a theory. Well, I'm being a little flippant here, but just demonstrating my point.

Same thing with unicorns, there is such a lack of evidence for the hypothesis of their physical existence that at this point it's been pretty much disproven.

The way God is generally hypothesized, it's hard (if not impossible) to prove or disprove. I don't adhere to someone's hypothesis that there is a god because they have not provided evidence that it exists. And maybe it's not even a valid hypotheses because it can't be proven or disproven. So in that sense I just lack a belief in their hypothesis. Making me an atheist. But to also hypothesize that you know for sure God does not exist is also equally, and in the same way, invalid.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Bah, if a theoretical agent had any interaction with reality, we should find evidence of some kind of interaction. If we don't then there are three possibilities: 1. It doesn't exist, 2. It doesn't interact with reality. If it doesn't interact with reality, it isn't real in any meaningfull way. If it isn't real, it doesn't exist. 3. We can't find where and how it interacts with reality, in that case it is the ever diminishing god of the gaps.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I agree that having not seen any meaningful interaction with reality that it shouldn't be included in any theory about how things work. However, I feel it's a logical jump to claim that this is proof it doesn't exist.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago

Hmmm... I don't think it is proof either. But it is imho the strongest possible indication of nonexistence.

For me to accept the possible existence of something, the possibility would have to be shown first. And I am at the moment convinced that the existence of anything without interaction with reality is impossible. Because I think existence is defined by interaction with reality.

Everything else would be apart, seperate from reality: not real.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Eh doing that isn't really worth the headache. Blind faith is, IMO, a socially acceptable mental illness. You can't cure a mental illness by brute force; all your gonna do is tire yourself out.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's not even that, the comic really does get right to the point. It would absolutely crush some people. My grandmother finds strength to deal with such bullshit by her beliefs so I wouldn't dare take that away from her. It's harmless as long as they aren't the type to push their beliefs on you and hurt you for it.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago

Your grandma is not (necessarily - I don't know her, she could be trafficking people) a bad person, but her beliefs and that of so many others who also are good (at least they might be) people provide the fertile ground for the growth of an agressive weed. It's not the grounds fault, it could be growing strawberries instead, but right now its existence nourishes a strangling vine that bears poisonous fruit.

We definetly should not poison the ground to kill the weed, though that certainly is a way to get rid of it. But we absolutely need to prevent it from spreading, new fields should not be infected by it and with the exhaution of the old places of growth, we might manage to extinct it.

That's why it is important to keep in mind that your grandma is (most likely) okay to just exist as a believer, but that the beliefs she holds are roots of something, that must not spread.

[–] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Free will also isn't real, but I don't go around to people I know and care about trying to collapse their entire world view around it. Sometimes it's better if people believe in fundamentally incorrect things that don't impact others.

Edit: here's a crazy idea, if you think I'm wrong...that's ok. Just leave me be? Maybe? Isn't that the point of my entire initial comment. Lol.

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

If you define "free will" as individual processing of input based on your genetic makeup and past experiences/memories and circumstances, with some inherent randomness. Then i guess free will is real.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

God damn quantum mechanics is like a "get out of determinism” card.

[–] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Randomness is the exact opposite of what people usually mean by freedom, though, isn't it?

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

But it's true. Our ~~neurons~~ axons are as small as can be, hence they sometimes misfire. Our brain works on that

[–] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I’m an athiest, and I generally believe that religion can be easily used to be shitty towards others and push them to being the worst type of people in life (more generally this happens with all ideologies). But for many religious people they aren’t too different compared to an athiest. They might go to church only on the holidays, or maybe they go weekly. They probably have many religious values. But at the end of the day they often make similar decisions for different reasons.

But I genuinely believe that trying to convince people that god isn’t real is super shitty and counter-productive. Show some compassion you fucking deodorant-free 🤓-brained reddit moderator. Take a shower.

I occasionally hear people say something like “We should be making people atheists. Religion is a scourge that uses ideology to harm others.” I can’t help to laugh when I hear this, because someone who takes this seriously (perhaps the person in the comic) is doing the literal thing they are decrying.

So what if someone is a christian because it comforts them? I don’t care if you think it lacks logic when your alternative lacks compassion.

Instead of opposing religion unilaterally, oppose the harmful ideas laundered by religion. Shame the politicians and the charlatans. Don’t shame mary-sue who goes to church weekly for being the a Christian, even though the shitbags at NIFB hate church are also Christians.

It’s certainly possible for people to be good to each other due to their religious beliefs. The local pro-palestine protests near me are primarilly organized by christians, and they are often led by a local group of leftist christian pacifists. They organize anti-war protests, support palestinian freedom, and do many smaller actions to alleviate suffering such as volunteering at the local food bank or other similar orgs. Compared to other groups that organize near me, I vastly prefer them over my local PSL chapter, or almost every ML group I’ve ever come across. Unlike many atheists I’ve worked with, that christian group will happily work with a local mosque, or synagogue when it doesn’t help them materially. This is because they don’t oppose people based on simple reasons like religion, but instead have deep solidarity with everyone else suffering through life on this terrible world.

Instead of opposing religion because you think it’s cringe how about you show solidarity and compassion for your fellow human beings.