this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
78 points (98.8% liked)

News

23310 readers
3559 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If President Convict didn't want to get punished during his campaign, maybe he shouldn't have done the crimes.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

But he did the crimes and i don't see any form of any kind of punishment hitting Trump until now and don't think we'll ever see the glorious day the orange gets pealed.

i cannot believe that these motherfuckers are allowed to argue that this is "election interference"

If this is election interference, then this sets the precedent that literally no candidate could ever be held legally responsible for crimes.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago
[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

WUT

Merchan wrote that he was postponing the sentencing "to avoid any appearance — however unwarranted — that the proceeding has been affected by or seeks to affect the approaching presidential election in which the Defendant is a candidate."

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

He doesn't want it to appear that Trump's candidacy is affecting the sentencing... So his candidacy will directly affect when the sentencing happens.

The courts need to simply ignore the politics, no matter what they do to try and avoid it they always fall right into the shit because anything a candidate does has a political spin from somewhere. Just ignore it completely, act like the politics isn't a part of the case, because it isn't. If the case happens to be occurring during an election, well the candidate shouldn't have been doing illegal shit in the first place.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

So intimidating his daughter worked.

The judiciary in this country deserves zero respect, top to bottom.

[–] blackluster117@possumpat.io 16 points 1 month ago

What a coward. Do your goddamn jobs and throw the book at the fucker!

[–] Westdragon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Basically if Mr Trump wins then the case just sorta "goes away". If he loses then the book probably gets thrown at him. I think the judge did it because he doesn't want the guaranteed retaliation if Trump wins.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Surprised_Pikachu.webp