this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
809 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

10271 readers
2686 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moody@lemmings.world 32 points 2 months ago (4 children)

They're not trying to destroy your thesis, they're trying to make sure it's complete and sccurate. In theory, the only person who knows the material is you, so they can't just ask anyone else.

I never really understood why they call it a defense. Nobody's going in there trying to insult or fight it.

[–] jupyter_rain@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

->Enter Thesis defense. Scream "Your thesis sucks!". You or your thesis now have to fight me

Tbh this scenario sounds way better to me than asking detailed questions about methodology or the results. But somehow I want to keep my job.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Two dissertations enter, one dissertation leaves.

[–] Klairabelle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So...this video doesn't depict a real thesis defence? Awkward...

https://youtu.be/Lrlro3YJ15o?si=h2D4FqXGmC-WvXtm

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nobody's going in there trying to insult or fight it.

Lmao

[–] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

That person went to a department that was WAY less toxic than mine was.

That said, my committee was lovely and my thesis and dissertation were relatively low-stress compared to some of the horror stories I've heard.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How science often works is you try to disprove things, and if you can't, you accept them as likely to be true. So, to show that the thesis is complete and accurate, they're trying to find places where it's incomplete or inaccurate. In the defense, your job is to defend against these attempts.

[–] kwomp2@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

So trying to destroy it and making sure its accurate and complete turns out to be the same thing

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

Blah blah blah²³, blah blah

²³ Some truths are just self evident

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 months ago

Unironically based.

Scientific works should ideally stand on their own and present all the required information to understand its conclusions in a easy to comprehend for form.

Requiring a human, who is more prone to emotional and subjective errors during live speech then during honest predetermined writing sessions is everything but ideal.

However, a scientific work should be the most possible comprehendible to the target audience which may require multiple mixed forms including live discussion of subject matter.

[scientific medium that allows people to learn and grow independently of other factors] > [scientific medium that aids learning and growth in combination with other factors] > [scientific medium that requires near full knowledge of the subject matter to understand (thats just art for smart people)]