this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31182 readers
530 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

“Mozilla acquires ad company”

FTFY, linuxiac.

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

At least it's not the other way around.

[–] Cistello@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago

Unpopular but it does make sense

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I don't know what it is with Mozilla, they're both the only saving grace of the open-source browser world and the most stupid internet company at the same time. And they've been both for decades, with a budget that could have allowed them to be and to do so much more...

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  1. I don't know why people think Mozilla is a "saving grace" of anything. One glance at their privacy policy proves otherwise.

  2. Mozilla has both a for-profit and non-profit arm, much like RPi (formerly) and OpenAI.

  3. I am fully in support of privacy-preserving ads. Much of the internet runs on ads. All your favorite YouTubers, favorite news sources, etc. are all survived by ads.

[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

This whole “for-profit owned by a non-profit” paradigm needs to globally crushed right the fuck now. It should never have been allowed to happen and should not be tolerated.

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

A saving grace in terms of browser engines. They are the only real competitor to Chromium.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 1 points 2 months ago

While both signal and Firefox are lords work... The actual leadership appears to be some clowns. Both appears to be essentially here to maintain status quo where tech nerds get their fix but the fix doesn't go mainstream. It is a fine line.

[–] Dendr0@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

So how long until our options in dodging the endless waves of shitty ads have completely gone? Sure, there might not be indication of it now, but it's probably a safe bet that Mozilla will try and pull some of the same shit Brave did in regards to ads/adblocking.

Thank fuck the internet as a whole is getting so shitty to the point it encourages us to go do something else. Turns out that avoiding the internet as a whole results in feeling a hell of a lot better about things in general.

Thanks I hate it

[–] pe1uca@lemmy.pe1uca.dev 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My unpopular opinion is I like ads, some are well thought, funny, and memorable.
Ads in videogames which allow you to have a small boost are also amazing, I don't have to spend money, just leave my phone for 30~60 seconds and I get a bit of premium currency while supporting the devs.

The annoying/worrisome part is all the tracking the ads have, and the ones which are very invasive which take half of the screen.
If we could go back to TV ads where everyone watches the ads without individual targeting, and with current technology to protect against hacking, and getting them in sensible places to not hide the content I would place and exception in my ublock and pihole for them.

[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Are you aware that ads affect your mind and brain and hence influence the way you think and decide upon financial transactions?

Ads are worse than you may think. Giving a buck to that dev is better for him than all those ads you "watch".

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Giving a buck to that dev is better for him than all those ads you "watch".

OC could watch 2 ads a day for 5 years and it still would make the dev less money than a $1 donation

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Didn't Louis Rossmann made that statistic in regards of patreon or other direct donations vs YouTube ads?

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You either die a hero or you live long enough to become the villain -- DC Comics

(I hope they do find a way to make this "for the best" -- maybe reviving Scroll like technology + private advertising + actually checking to make sure advertisers are legitimate so you can pay to turn ads off on lots of websites and the ads aren't leading to malware -- but it's very concerning in general)