this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58937 readers
3644 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Lmao

because [the moratorium] only applied to police

Fuck bezos and fuck amazon

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

New Orleans did a pilot with allowing facial recognition for major felonies and it just didn’t work at all. Of the 15 requests, 9 failed to make a match and of the 6 that did return a “match,” 3 were the wrong person.

That’s a small sample size — most cities don’t release data — but it explains why cities that happily use facial recognition software don’t see reductions in crime or cleared cases. It’s just a complete waste of money and the investigators’ time. Facial recognition tech can (usually) identify friends in photos but criminals aren’t posing for fancy modern phone cameras in decent lighting. They’re using security cam stills and anyone committing a major felony probably has their face at least partially covered.

It’s like that software that’s supposed to identify gunshots but has so many false positives, police stop even bothering to follow-up after awhile. Maybe not as stupid as the NYPD buying robots but still a huge waste of resources.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago

Cops and wasting resources on stupid shit that doesn't actually help them solve crimes.

Name a more iconic duo.

[–] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not to mention the primarily black population of Louisiana who are disproportionately targeted for crimes will be the greatest number of false positives .

Due to the common knowledge the facial recognition is severely lacking when it comes to successfully identifying black populations due to darker tones being harder to differentiate.

This would take an existing problem and magnify it by creating a larger, more automated police state.

Not to mention data privacy/security, which the LA DMV just got their data hacked in the last two years...

Seriously a public safety violation all-around.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago

Due to the common knowledge the facial recognition is severely lacking when it comes to successfully identifying black populations due to darker tones being harder to differentiate.

It's not even this, if you use high quality cameras, black skin can be easily and well photographed.

The issue is by and large most security cameras use super cheap cameras that don't have a wide range of color they can capture, so you end up losing all definition on the faces of darker skinned individuals.

This has been an issue since cameras were first invented, and better cameras that solve this issue were created long ago.

It's because our capitalist overlords are cheap bastards.