this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
79 points (70.9% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2300 readers
18 users here now

Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Obligate Cats are Obligate Carnivores. Also, anyone who says otherwise is a fucking moron. Cats can't be vegan.

[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They can be, but it cost a lot of money, and you need to constantly be monitoring them by testing their urine at home. And if things aren't going well, you need to get to a vet asap.

Or, you can just feed them the fish scraps that would otherwise be thrown out. Additional fish aren't being killed, and you don't need to be worried that you're causing additional harm to the cat.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Even granting that cats can be sustained on a diet of substances derived entirely by plants, cats can't actually be vegan. Veganism is a philosophy of what it means to be a person and how humans should live, which cats don't really have the brain structure to do. Even if you ignore that fact, cats are (I'm saying this as someone who loves cats) psychopathic little murderers; no matter how well-fed a cat is, it will still instinctively kill prey animals. Cats on the hunt will sometimes kill something to eat, see a new bit of prey, abandon their old kill, and hunt the new thing. Cats cannot be vegan.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 13 points 2 months ago

I don't think the concern is cats killing other animals, I think it's purchasing animal based products for the cat

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blaze 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Updated the title, thanks for the correction

You're welcome!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 months ago (2 children)

explain why cats nibble house plants then

checkmate atheists

[–] ScruffyDucky@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because it helps to move fur balls through the digestion system

yahtzee ummm monotheists?

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago

Go fish, agnostics!

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Be a use spider plant is a mild hallucinogen and even sober cats are pretty into seeing ghosts.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I'm the super paranoid guy about all of this stuff and this exact same thing occurred to me

Why are there a few different changes to sub and site policy connected with the concept of "misinformation", but somehow skirting around the type of misinformation which it seems is the most pressing issue by far? I.e. accounts which are devoted to posting misinformation?

Honestly I thought the vegan cat food thing was handled semi ok. But surely that's not the more pressing thing, to justify big team meetings and huge changes to policy and writing misinformation stuff into the legal side and user agreement.

Right?

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're spot on, I think. There are several accounts entirely devoted to pushing agendas in bad faith that go unbanned, yet this?

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What sort of stuff are they pushing?

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The usual Lyndon Larouche stuff that was co-opted by Russian state propagandists that appeals to people smart enough to see the problems but not actually be well read into what's been happening.

[–] Blaze 10 points 2 months ago

Seemed an important changes to me as well, but I guess they had the MBFC bot thing happening at the same time and wanted to hit two birds with one stone? Not sure to be honest

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm not a vegan. But my $.02 as a cat person is this: the cat has biological dietary requirements. If you fail to meet those requirements, it is animal abuse.

By trying to squeeze a cat, an obligate carnivore in nature, into a vegan diet, either you have to be extremely careful about it to ensure you meet all their nutritional needs, or simply, and far more easily, just don't do it.

Encouraging people who likely do not have the means or expertise to monitor how their pet is doing, to switch them to a vegan diet, is dangerous to the health of the animal.

I'm not sure I disagree with the admin on this one, though there's probably a better way they could have handled it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blaze 13 points 2 months ago

I hope this is okay, we were discussing in this thread (https://feddit.org/post/2379333/1721964 ) a potential community for Fediverse memes, I guess this might be the closest as it documents somehow what happened in the drama?

[–] anas@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I haven’t looked into the drama that much, but isn’t the cat diet debate extremely relevant to the admin action? Whether or not it was animal abuse, therefore would it be against the instance rules?

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah but from what I can tell the people who are feeding their cats non meats are way too adverse to acknowledging that they're wrong and have been tripling down at every opportunity

[–] Blaze 9 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Interesting to see 10 downvotes for 27 upvotes, seems like people want to have that debate again.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's been infuriating seeing everyone's reactions devolve into dunking on vegans about vegan cat food instead of the overreaction of Rookie. So I will say that it IS possible for a cat to have a vegan diet as long as the essential nutrients are supplemented and you work with a vet. One big thing is taurine, but the way meat is processed in cat food removes the taurine so it is added back with synthetic taurine anyway. Like just read the actual thread Rookie freaked out on. No one was saying only feed your cat vegetables and hope for the best.

https://lemmy.world/post/18691022

Also people using obligate carnivore but not understanding what it means. What is an obligate carnivore?

"Some carnivores, particularly cats (family Felidae), are obligate carnivores, meaning they cannot obtain all the nutrients that they need from the plant kingdom and bacteria. In particular, obligate carnivores lack the enzyme needed to split carotene, obtained from plants, into vitamin A. Instead, these animals obtain vitamin A from the liver of their prey. Obligate carnivores are similarly unable to synthesize some essential very-long-chain, highly unsaturated fatty acids that other animals can make from shorter fatty acids found in plant."

So, an obligate carnivore is an animal that needs to (is obligated to) obtain some nutrients by eating the flesh of other animals (or those nutrients would have to be supplied in a form the cat can absorb by means of supplementation). Cats do not have the long digestive tracts of ruminants to efficiently ferment raw starch or fiber, but that doesn’t mean they cannot digest plant matter at all. It also does not mean they are unable to obtain any nutrients from plants or from fiber. However, being an obligate carnivore does mean that their diet MUST provide certain nutrients from the flesh of other animals or from supplementation.

https://rawfedandnerdy.com/what-is-an-obligate-carnivore

Studies on cats eating a vegan diet? Science says we need more studies because it is not as black and white as all the people kneejerking about it are saying.

Whilst the quality and amount of evidence needs to be considered in formulating recommendations, there was no overwhelming evidence of adverse effects arising from use of these diets and there was some evidence of benefits. It is, however, recommended that future high-quality studies, with standardized outcome measures and large sample sizes, be conducted. At the current time, if guardians wish to feed their companion animals vegan diets, a cautious approach should be taken using commercially produced diets which have been formulated considering the nutritional needs of the target species.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9860667/

I learned a lot by listening to the original commenters instead of circlejerking about vegans bad amirite. But I couldn't possibly reply to every comment with this so I'll leave it here instead. There is a reason I don't use a Lemmy.world account, their moderation sucks.

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The meme is literally about you lol

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

Well the way I was thinking is that in order to talk about how Rookie overreacted and fucked up, I would have to get people to look at the original thread and establish why this was not animal abuse or misinformation. Many people have not read the original thread. It was not animal abuse to talk about how cats can theoretically be vegan and talk about the studies that support it. Rookie decided this was animal abuse and misinformation and removed the whole mod team while power tripping when it wasn't against any rules. Now LW has rules about misinformation as if to back up Rookie being able to do this again. The mods were restored but people keep thinking Rookie was justified. It just blows my mind. I'm also not the only one talking about obligate carnivores and cats being vegan on this post, I'm just the only one that read the original thread and am encouraging others to see how Rookie messed up and this was an extreme overreaction rather than more circlejerking vegans bad. Reddit doesn't even get this bad, LW seems like they want to be a mini reddit but worse.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Note you can even edit the image you posted

[–] Blaze 3 points 2 months ago

I know, but it was late for me and I didn't want to do it again. Might do later today

[–] Donut@leminal.space 2 points 2 months ago

The future is now baby. I wonder how that will throw a wrench in some moderation systems, actually.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Regardless of whether the initial actions from the admin were justified, although I think they were.

Their response was to ban the admin, and reinstate a number of comments they had deleted, which is completely out of line. I think they actually got off lightly, all things considered.

load more comments
view more: next ›